1016 MORTGAGES—SALES. [ART. 66.

F. G L , (1860,) art 64, sec 8 1825, ch 203, sec. 5 1826, ch. 192, sec. 3.
1833, ch. 181, sec. 4.

9. All such sales shall be reported under oath to the court
having chancery jurisdiction where the sale is made, and there
shall be the same proceedings on such report as if the same were
made by a trustee under a decree of said court, and the court shall
have full power to hear and determine any objections which may
be filed against such sale by any person interested in the property,
and may confirm or set aside said sale.

Wilson v. Watts, 9 Md 356 Gayle v.Fattle, 14 Md 69 White v.Malcolm,
15 Md 541 Hubbard v. Jarrell, 23 Md 66 Warfield v. Ross, 38 Md. 85.
Warfield v. Dorsey, 39 Md 299. Warehime v. Carroll Co Build. Ass'n. 44 Md.
512 Frostburg Mutual Build Ass'n v.Lowdermilk, 50 Md. 179. Webb v.
Haeffer, 53 Md. 190. Pataps. Guano Co v. Elder, 53 Md. 464.

Ibid. sec. 9 1826, ch. 192, sec 5.

10. If such sale be set aside by the court, a re-sale may be
ordered to be made by the party who made the previous sale, or
the court may, if justice requires it, appoint a trustee to sell the
same.

Reeside v. Peter, 35 Md 220 Basshor v. Stewart, 54 Md. 380. Dircks v.
Logsdon, 59 Md 177

Ibid, sec 10 1826. ch 192, sec 4 1836, ch 249, sec 7.

11. All such sales, when confirmed by the court and the pur-
chase money is paid, shall pass all the title which the mortgagor
had in the said mortgaged premises at the time of the recording
of the mortgage.

Warfield v. Ross. 38 Md 85 Leonard v. Groome, 47 Md. 504. Dircks v.
Logsdon, 59 Md. 177.

Ibid, sec 11. 1826, ch. 192, sec 5. 1836, ch. 249, sec. 8.

12. Upon a sale of such mortgaged premises, any person
claiming an interest in the equity of redemption may apply to
the court confirming the sale to have the surplus of the proceeds
of sale, after payment to the mortgagee of his claim and expenses,
paid over to such person, or so much thereof as will satisfy his
claim, and the court shall distribute such surplus equitably among
the claimants thereto.

Leonard v.Groome, 47 Md 504.