clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 96   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

96 CONSTITUTION OF MARYLAND [Art. 4]

Where an offence may be punishable by death, either of the parties to the indictment
is entitled to a removal as a matter of right; appeal. Where, however, the offence is
not punishable by death, the right to a removal only exists where the trial court de-
termines in its discretion that the suggestion is true or that there is reasonable ground
for same; appeal; when only action of lower court will be reversed. Tidewater Port.
Cement Co. v. State, 122 Md. 98.

Generally.

An appeal lies from the action of the court in striking out a judgment solely upon
the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, although the motion is made during
the term at which the judgment was rendered. This section, as it stood before the
amendment of 1874, ch. 364, dealt with. Kimball v. Harman, 34 Md. 403.

The amendment to this section proposed by the act of 1874, ch. 364, and the fact
that said act was not set out verbatim on the journals, referred to in upholding an
amendment to art. 7, sec. 1—see notes thereto and to art. 14, sec. 1. Worman v.
Hagan, 78 Md. 164.

This section referred to in deciding that there was no error in trying a traverser in
the petit jury room instead of the court room. Button v. State, 123 Md. 388.

This section referred to in dealing with art. 4, sec. 39—see notes thereto. City
Passenger Ry. Co. v. Nugent, 86 Md. 360.

This section referred to in In Re Ades, 6 F. Supp. 467.

See art. 4, sec. 39; art. 15, sec. 6, and notes to art. 4, sec. 7.

See art. 75, sec. 109, et seq., An. Code.

See arts. 5 and 20 of the Declaration of Rights.

Sec. 9. The Judge or Judges of any Court may appoint such officers for
their respective Courts as may be found necessary; and such officers of the
Courts in the City of Baltimore shall be appointed by the Judges of the
Supreme Bench of Baltimore City. It shall be the duty of the General
Assembly to prescribe by law a fixed compensation for all such officers, and
said Judge or Judges shall from time to time investigate the expenses,
costs and charges of their respective Courts, with a view to a change or
reduction thereof, and report the result of such investigation to the General
Assembly for its action.

Without this section the judges undoubtedly have the power to appoint such officers
as are necessary for the proper conduct of the business of the courts. This section re-
ferred to in deciding that the control of the court house vested by art. 25, sec. 1, of
the An. Code, in the county commissioners, could not be given to the court crier—see
notes to art. 8 of the Declaration of Rights. Prince George's County v. Mitchell, 97 Md.
338.

Sec. 10. The Clerks of the several Courts created or continued by this
Constitution shall have charge and custody of the records and other papers;
shall perform all the duties, and be allowed the fees which appertain to
their several offices, as the same now are or may hereafter be regulated
by law. And the office and business of said Clerks, in all their departments,
shall be subject to the visitorial power of the Judges of their respective
Courts, who shall exercise the same, from time to time, so as to insure the
faithful performance of the duties of said offices; and it shall be the duty of
the Judges of said Courts, respectively, to make from time to time such
rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper for the government
of said Clerks, and for the performance of the duties of their offices, which
shall have the force of law until repealed or modified by the General

Assembly.

The visitorial power given the judges over the clerks is for the purpose of secur-
ing the faithful performance of duty; it was not the design to relieve the clerks from
obligations to do what the law already required of them; the judges have no other or
greater power than of supervisal, regulation and direction. An order of court requiring
the clerk to make a certain index and providing for his compensation therefor, held
invalid. Peter v. Prettyman, 62 Md. 575.

See art. 17 of the An. Code.

Sec. 11. The election for Judges hereinbefore provided, and all elections
for Clerks, Registers of Wills and other officers provided in this Con-


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 96   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives