clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 816   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

816 ARTICLE 23

The act of 1868, ch. 471, sec. 59, held applicable to increased capital stock issued
under sec. 28, et seq. Booth v. Campbell, 37 Md. 529.

A suit to enforce a stockholder's liability, under art. 26, sec. 52 of the Code of 1860,
might be brought under the practice act of 1864, ch. 6, applicable to Baltimore City.
Norris v. Wrenschall, 34 Md. 492. And see Coulbourn v. Boulton, 100 Md. 354.

Sec. 72 of the Code of 1904 referred to in deciding that a building association was liable
on a note discounted for the purpose of raising money to pay a borrower the amount
advanced to him. Davis v. West Saratoga, etc., Union, 32 Md. 294.

The act of 1872, ch. 325, repealed the act of 1872, ch. 203, approved on the same day.
Strauss v. Heiss, 48 Md. 294.

Act of 1872, ch. 325, cited but not construed in State v. Davis, 70 Md. 240.

For notes on the liability of stockholders to creditors of the corporation, see Matthews
v. Albert, 24 Md. 527; Murphy v. Patapsco Ins. Co., 6 Md. 99.

Bill of complaint upheld. Hughes v. Hall, 117 Md. 547, and Hall v. Hughes, 119 Md.
489, affirmed. Wright v. Lewis, 149 Md. 73.

Suit by trustees in bankruptcy of corporation to collect unpaid balances on stock
subscriptions, held that subscriptions to capital stock of corporation need not be written
and signed; not necessary to call upon subscribers to stock in order to fix liability to
creditors of corporation for unpaid parts of subscription; when subscriber may be free
from liability. Wright v. Lewis, 161 Md. 674.

Cited but not construed in Tyler v. Receivers of Furniture Co., 160 Md. 338.

Cited in Ghingher v. Bachtell, 169 Md. 687.

Cited in dissenting opinion relative to stockholders' liability under Art. 11, sec. 97
Allender v. Ghingher, 170 Md. 169.

See sec. 51 and notes to secs. 91 and 147.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 78. 1912, sec. 67. 1908, ch. 240, sec. 42.

83. The directors of a corporation may, unless otherwise provided in
the by-laws, determine the conditions upon which a new certificate of stock
may be issued in place of a certificate which is alleged to have been lost or
destroyed. They may, in their discretion, require the owner of such cer-
tificate or his legal representative to give bond, with sufficient surety, to
the corporation to indemnify it against any loss or claim which may arise
by reason of the issue of a certificate in the place of the missing one.
"See sec. 67.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 79. 1912, sec. 67A. 1912, ch. 78.

84. When a certificate of shares of the capital stock of any corporation
formed under the laws of this State, has heretofore been or may hereafter
be issued to a person as agent or trustee and the stock ledger of such cor-
poration does not disclose the principal or cestui que trust, and said cer-
tificate has been lost or destroyed and no person, except the administrator
of the person to whom the said certificate was issued as agent or trustee,
has made claim to it against said corporation for more than thirty years,
and the said corporation has been a going concern for more than ten years
during the aforesaid period of thirty years, and has declared more than five
dividends upon its capital stock during the last thirty years, and the said
dividends declared upon the shares of stock alleged to be lost or destroyed,
have not been paid to any person, and said agent or trustee the holder of
record of said certificate is dead, then and in such case the administrator
of the person to whom the alleged lost or destroyed certificate was issued as
agent or trustee as aforesaid, and still being the holder of record of said
certificate, shall after ten days' written notice to said corporation, demand-
ing the issuance of a new certificate of stock to him as such administrator,
be entitled to receive such new certificate in the place of the one alleged to
be lost or destroyed in his name as administrator, and said administrator
shall also be entitled to receive all dividends that may have been declared
upon such certificate or number of shares of stock alleged to be lost or de-
stroyed and remaining unpaid. Such issuance and delivery of a new cer-
tificate and the payment of said dividends by the corporation to the said


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 816   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives