clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 463   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

BILLS OF EXCHANGE AND PROMISSORY NOTES 463

territory of the United States, and protested according to the laws or
customs of the place where such bill shall be made payable, shall be
entitled to recover so much current money as will produce a good bill of
exchange at the current exchange of such bills, and also eight per cent,
damages upon the value of the principal sum mentioned in such bill, and
costs of protest, together with legal interest upon the value of the principal
sum therein mentioned, from the time of protest until the principal and
damages are paid and satisfied.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 5. 1912, sec. 5. 1904, sec. 5. 1888, sec. 5. 1785, ch. 38, sec. 3.

5. If any endorser of any such bill shall pay to the owner or holder
thereof the value of the principal and the damages and interest aforesaid,
such endorser shall have a right to recover the sum paid, with legal interest
upon the same, from the drawer or any person, company or corporation
liable to such endorser upon such bill of exchange.

. An. Code, 1924, sec. 6. 1912, sec. 6. 1904, sec. 6. 1888, sec. 6. 1837, ch. 253.

6. A protest, duly made by a notary public, of a promissory note for
non-payment, or of a bill of exchange, whether foreign or inland, for
non-acceptance or non-payment, shall be prima facie evidence of such
non-acceptance or non-payment, and of the presentment of such note for
payment, or of such bill for acceptance or payment, at the time and in
the manner stated in the protest.

This section must be strictly construed, and the protest is prima facie evidence of
non-acceptance or non-payment, and of presentment at the time and in the manner
stated only. Collateral and independent matters contained in the protest are not evi-
dence. Reier v. Strauss, 54 Md. 286; Weems v. Farmers' Bank, 15 Md. 239.

The protest is only prima jade evidence, and may be overcome. Howard Bank v.
Carson, 50 Md. 27; Staylor v. Ball, 24 Md. 199; Ricketts v. Pendleton, 14 Md. 329.

If the protest states that "notice of protest" was sent to the endorser and the manner
of such notice, it implies a demand and refusal, unless the protest itself shows no
sufficient demand. Nailor v. Bowie, 3 Md. 257.

The protest should designate or identify the note—usually the original or a copy is
attached. The signature of the notary may be printed, if it appears to be his act.
Fulton v. Maccracken, 18 Md. 541.

This section does not exclude other evidence of non-acceptance, etc. Sasscer v.
Farmers' Bank, 4 Md. 419; Nailor v. Bowie, 3 Md. 258.

The design of this section is to place foreign and inland bills on the same footing.
The, protest or authenticated copy must be received in evidence according to the lex fori,
and there need be no proof of the signature or seal. Crowley v. Barry, 4 Gill, 201 ;
Whiteford v. Burckmyer, 1 Gill, 129.

A check is an inland bill of exchange, and therefore protestable under this section
and sec. 7. Hawthorn v. State, 56 Md. 534. See also Moses v. Franklin Bank, 34 Md. 579.

For the purpose of securing the benefit of this section, banks receiving bills of
exchange for collection, should place them in the hands of a notary for protest, if
necessary. Citizens' Bank v. Howell, 8 Md. 547.

This section does not alter the law in regard to the necessity of notice, or the char-
acter of the notice. Graham v. Sangston, 1 Md. 66.

This section applied. Nailor v. Bowie, 3 Md. 255.

Cited but not construed in Farmers' Bank v. Bowie, 4 Md. 295.

Insufficiency of notary's certificate may be supplied by other testimony. See notes
to sec. 7. Wolf v. Union Trust Co., 150 Md. 388.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 7. 1912, sec. 7. 1904, sec. 7. 1888, sec. 7. 1837, ch. 253.

7. When such protest shall state that notice of such non-payment or
non-acceptance has been sent or delivered to the party or parties to such
note or bill, and the manner of such notice, such protest shall be prima facie
evidence that such notice has been sent or delivered in the manner therein
stated.

If no sufficient demand was made, the protest is not evidence to prove notice
Farmers', etc., Bank v. Allen, 18 Md. 478.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 463   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives