clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 3502   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

3502 ARTICLE 93

An; Code, 1924, sec. 353. 1912, sec. 343. 1904, sec. 336. 1888, sec. 327. 1798, ch. 101,

sub-ch. 2, sec. 6.

358. If any will or codicil be exhibited for proof to the register of
wills of the county wherein the same may be proved, in the recess of the
court, and any of the next relations of the deceased shall attend and make
no objections, or enter no caveat, or if it shall appear that reasonable
notice of the time of exhibiting the same hath been given to such of the
next relations as might conveniently be therewith served, and no person
shall object or enter a caveat, the register shall proceed to take the probate
thereof.

In absence of near relatives of deceased or notice to them, it was error to admit will
to probate. Presence of counsel; request for delay. O'Hara v. Miller, 153 Md. 117.

This and the following section do not contemplate a formal notice such as is con-
templated by sec. 360. If it appears that reasonable notice has been given under this
section, the court may probate will. When only notice of probate need be given. Stanley
v. Safe Deposit Co., 88 Md. 401, and Lederer v. Johannsen, 124 Md. 453, affirmed.
Parker v. Leighton, 131 Md. 413; Perrin v. Praeger, 154 Md. 546.

What is meant by the probate of a will, and what is necessary thereto? Tilghman
v. France, 99 Md. 615.

Where revocation of probate of a will is not asked, and there was no appeal from
order permitting will to be probated, nor from an order revoking or refusing to re-
voke that order, failure to give notice required by this and two following sections cannot
be relied upon on appeal. In absence of proof to contrary, court of appeals will assume
that orphans' court gave reasonable notice, and properly decided all matters required
to be decided. Grill v. O'Dell, 111 Md. 68.

Cited but not construed in Campbell v. Porter, 162 U. S. 483.

See sees. 283 and 353; also notes to secs. 72, 353, 359 and 360.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 354. 1912, sec. 344. 1904, sec. 337. 1888, sec. 328. 1798, ch. 101,

sub-ch. 2, sec. 7.

359. If any such will be exhibited for probate to the orphans' court
of the county where the same may be proved, and any of the next relations
of the deceased shall attend, or if notice shall appear to have been given
as aforesaid, and no caveat shall have been made against the same, the
said court may forthwith proceed to take probate thereof.

It is only where none of the near relations of deceased are present when will is
exhibited for probate that it must appear that reasonable notice was given them;
where any of the near relatives attend and no objection or caveat is filed orphans'
court may probate will. The order of orphans' court admitting a will to probate should
not be rescinded because one of heirs or next of kin subsequently determines to caveat
the will. If authority of orphans' court to probate will had depended upon notice to
near relations, that court could have determined, subject to an appeal, whether such
notice had been given; if action of court was procured by material misrepresentation,
however innocent, its order based thereon could be rescinded. Lederer v. Johannsen,
124 Md. 455; Linthicum v. Linthicum, 130 Md: 151; Perrin v. Praeger, 154 Md. 546.

Duty of orphans' court under this section; that court has jurisdiction to determine
whether there has been the required attendance or notice. Character of notice required
by this and preceding section. Issues will not be granted on question as to whether
notice has been given, after orphans' court has acted thereon. Time within which a
petition setting up a lack of notice must be filed. Stanley v. Safe Deposit Co., 88 Md.
404. And see Pacy v. Cosgrove, 113 Md. 320.

Cited but not construed in Campbell v. Porter, 162 U. S. 483.

See notes to secs. 72, 353, 358 and 360.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 355. 1912, sec. 345. 1904, sec. 338. 1888, sec. 329. 1798, ch. 101,
sub-ch. 2, sec. 8.

360. If any will or codicil be exhibited to the orphans' court, and none
of the near relations of the deceased shall attend, and no notice shall
appear to have been given, the court may either direct summons to the
said near relations, or some one or more of them, to appear on some fixed
day to show cause wherefore the same should not be proved, or direct such
notice to be given in the public papers or otherwise, as they may think


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 3502   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives