clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 3484   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

3484 ARTICLE 93

is desired to be filed. Nature of wife's rights in property left her by her husband's will.
Kernan v. Carter, 132 Md. 588.

Where widow renounces, she is only entitled under this section to one-third of per-
sonal estate of her husband, although there are no children. This section is not affected
by act of 1916, ch. 325 (art, 46, sec. 1, et seq.), or the act of 1898, ch. 331 (art. 93, sec. 128,
et seq.). Harris v. Harris, 139 Md. 192 (decided prior to act of 1922, ch. 348).

Under this section widow has six months from grant of letters after her husband's
will is probated, within which to renounce. Renunciation held to have been made in
time. Form of renunciation. Pindell v. Pindell, 40 Md. 539.

Where a widow renounces she is entitled to her share of the personal estate in kind
under this section. In such cases she takes not under will but in opposition to it, and
property bequeathed her remains as if no such bequest had been made. Effect of re-
nunciation upon other bequests. Kuykendall v. Devecmon, 78 Md. 542; Hanson v.
Worthington, 12 Md. 438; Darrington v. Rogers, 1 Gill, 410.

Under this section and sec. 330 where a husband renounces the costs of caveat pro-
ceedings should be borne by estate passing under will, and husband should not be
charged with any part of it. Grabill v. Plummer, 95 Md. 61.

This section applied. Gough v. Manning, 26 Md. 366; Durham v. Rhodes, 23 Md. 241.

If no provision for a widow is made by her husband's will this section has no applica-
tion. Hokamp v. Hagaman, 36 Md. 518.

For a case involving a mutilated renunciation and a certificate of register of wills
as to renunciation having been made, see Handy v. State, 7 H. & J. 46.

For a case involving the law relative to a renunciation prior to the adoption of this
section, see Griffith v. Griffith, 4 H. & McH. 101.

Cited but not construed in Ring v. Zimmerman, 94 Md. 16.

See notes to sec. 330 and to art. 46, sec. 3.

1933, ch. 588.

315... The renunciation as provided in Section 311, be1 made by the
guardian of an infant spouse, when authorized so to do by the Court
having jurisdiction of the infant's estate, or may be made on behalf of
an incompetent when authorized by the equity court having jurisdiction
of the person of said incompetent. The time to make such renunciation
may be enlarged before its expiration by an order of the Orphans' Court
where such will was probated for a further period of not exceeding six
months upon any one application, upon a petition showing reasonable
cause and on notice given to such persons and in such manner as the
Orphans' Court may direct.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 312. 1912, sec. 303. 1904, sec. 299. 1888, sec. 293. 1798, ch. 101,

sub-ch. 13, sec. 3.

316. If the will of the husband devise a part of both real and personal
estate she shall renounce the whole, or be otherwise barred of her right to
both real and personal estate.

This section applied. Durham v. Rhodes, 23 Md. 242.

See notes to secs. 313 and 330.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 313. 1912, sec. 304. 1904, sec. 300. 1888, sec. 294. 1798, ch. 101,

sub-ch. 13, sec. 4.

317. If the will devise only a part of the real estate, or only a part of
the personal estate, the devise shall bar her of only the real or personal
estate, as the case may require; provided, nevertheless, that if the devise
of either real or personal estate, or both, shall be expressly in lieu of her
legal share of one or both, she shall accordingly be barred unless she re-
nounce as aforesaid.

This section applied. Durham v. Rhodes, 23 Md. 241. Thomas v. Wood, 1 Md. Ch. 300.

This section referred to in construing sec. 314—see notes thereto. Collins v. Carman,
5 Md. 528.

Cited in Dowell v. Dowell, Daily Record, Jan. 3, 1940.

See notes to sec. 313.

See notes to sec. 330.

1 The word "may" evidently omitted.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 3484   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives