clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 3075   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

REVENUE AND TAXES 3075

Where a person makes a deed of trust of certain property under which she is paid
income for life and whereby she reserves a power of revocation and of testamentary
disposition, and in pursuance of latter power she wills the property to collaterals, such
property is subject to tax imposed by this section. Long and unbroken construction
of a statute by officers charged with its administration. Smith v. State, 134 Md. 478.

Where a testator died prior to adoption of act of 1908, sec. 120, leaving property to
his wife for life and then to certain remaindermen, wife haying died in 1916, tax
on property passing to the remaindermen is computed at rate in effect prior to act of
1908. State v. Safe Dep. Co., 132 Md. 254.

The collateral inheritance tax applies to income of estate accruing during the period
of administration. Intention of act of 1908, ch. 695, was to change collateral inheritance
tax law generally relative to rate of tax. Safe Dep. Co. v. State, 143 Md. 645.

A charge of a collateral inheritance tax against life interest of testator's widow,
held to be at variance with this section. Hagerstown Trust Co. v. Ex. of Mealey,
119 Md. 230.

Washington County Hospital and Library held not to be exempt from the tax
imposed by this section. Washington Hospital v. Mealey, 121 Md. 275.

Property over which a power of appointment may be exercised by will of donee
of power is not liable for collateral inheritance tax as if it were property of donee.
Prince de Beam v. Winans, 111 Md. 472.

If executor pays over money to a legatee without deducting tax required by this
section, the state may sue such legatee for money "had and received." The act of
1880, ch. 444, held valid and applicable. Montague v. State, 54 Md. 483; Fisher v.
State, 106 Md. 120.

Where a will probated in Indiana bequeaths certain stock of a bank in Baltimore
city to executor to pay sum mentioned in a certain contract, and before appointment
of administrator in Maryland, bank pays value of a portion of the stock to the foreign
executor, no collateral inheritance tax thereon is payable in Maryland. Citizens' Bank
v. Sharp, 53 Md. 531. C/. State v. Dalrymple, 70 Md. 302.

This and the following sections held to apply to a bequest of freedom to a slave.
State v. Dorsey, 6 Gill, 389.

1933, ch. 323. 1936 (Sp. Sess.), ch. 124, sec. 105. 1937, ch. 189.

111. The taxes imposed by the two preceding sections of this sub-title
shall apply to all tangible or intangible property, real or personal, passing
either by will or under the intestate laws of this State, or by deed, gift,
grant, bargain or sale, made in contemplation of death, or intended to take
effect in possession at or after the death of a 'decedent, including property
in which the decedent, prior to his death, had an interest as joint tenant
or tenant in common, and including property over which the decedent re-
tained any dominion during his lifetime, except, however, any interest, legal
or equitable of any surviving spouse in any free-share account in any build-
ing or homestead association or in any monies on deposit in the names of
husband and wife passing to such surviving spouse. The reservation of a
beneficial interest in favor of the decedent or of a power of revocation,
absolute or conditional or of a power of appointment by will or otherwise,
in or over any property passing subject to the tax imposed by this sub-
title, shall be deemed to constitute dominion within the meaning of this
section. In cases of joint tenancy, where the interests are not otherwise
specified or fixed by law, the interest passing shall be determined by
dividing the value of the property by the number of joint tenants. Pro-
vided, however, that any legacy or bequest to any person or body corporate,
the value of which does not exceed one hundred dollars, shall be exempt
from the payment of any tax under the provisions of this sub-title.

The inheritance tax, in cases of joint tenancy, is not retrospective because joint
tenancy was created before passage of Act, as it is the existence of the joint tenancy
at death of decedent which is basis for tax. Mylander v. Connor, 172 Md. 329.

See notes to sec. 112.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 125. 1912, sec. 121. 1904, sec. 118. 1888, sec. 103. 1844, ch. 237, sec. 2.

1864, ch. 200. 1874, ch. 483, sec. 114. 1908, ch. 695. 1929, ch. 226, sec. 106.

1935, ch. 90, sec. 106. 1935, ch. 520. 1936 (Sp. Sess.), ch. 124, sec. 106.

112. Every executor, administrator, trustee, agent, fiduciary or other
person making distribution of any property passing subject to the taxes
98


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 3075   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives