clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2845   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

PLEADINGS, PRACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW 2845

suit or action, issue, presentment or indictment, to be transmitted to some
other court having jurisdiction in such case for trial; but in all other
cases of presentment or indictment pending in any of the courts of law in
this State having jurisdiction thereof, in addition to the suggestion in
writing of either of the parties to such presentment or indictment that
such party cannot have a fair and impartial trial in the court in which
the same may be pending, it shall be necessary for the party making such
suggestion to make it satisfactorily appear to the court that such sugges-
tion is true, or that there is reasonable ground for the same; and there-
upon the said court shall order and direct the record of proceedings in
such presentment or indictment to be transmitted to some other court hav-
ing jurisdiction in such cases for trial; and such right of removal shall
exist upon suggestion in cases when all the judges of said court may be
disqualified, under the provisions of the constitution, to sit in any such
case; and said court to which the record of proceedings in such suit or
action, issue, presentment or indictment may be so transmitted, shall hear
and determine the same in like manner as if such suit or action, issue,
presentment or indictment had been originally instituted therein.1

When right of removal applies.

This section has no application to cases in equity, or in the orphans' court. Cooke v.
Cooke, 41 Md. 367.

Right of removal can only be exercised in courts having original jurisdiction. Geekie
v. Harbourd, 52 Md. 461; Cooke v. Cooke, 41 Md. 367; Hoshall v. Hoffacker, 11 Md. 363.

Right of removal does not apply to proceedings instituted under statute for for-
feiture of chartered franchises. Belair Club v. State, 74 Md. 3001.

This section does not apply to issues framed in insolvency proceedings at instance of
creditor. Trayhem v. Hamill, 53 Md. 91; Michael v. Schroeder, 4 H. & J. 227.

Up to what time case may be removed.

Right of removal must be exercised before trial commences, and an amendment of
declaration does not affect such right; but fact that one trial has already been had
ending in a disagreement by jury, does not defeat right of removal. Cooke v. Cooke,
41 Md. 367; Sittig v. Birkestack, 38 Md. 161; Deford v. State, 30 Md. 196.

A case may be removed at any time before panel of jurors is completed by being
sworn. McMillan v. State, 68 Md. 309; Price v. State, 8 Gill, 297. Cf. Griffin v. Leslie,
20 Md. 19; Taxicab Co. v. Emanuel, 125 Md. 265.

Where a judgment by default has been entered, and nothing remains to be done but
to assess damages or determine the amount thereof, the case cannot be removed.
Northern Central Ry. Co. v. Rutledge, 41 Md. 372.

Who may remove.

Right of removal resides in parties plaintiff or defendant, and not in each of several
plaintiffs or defendants, the word "parties" being used in a collective sense. Baltimore
County v. United Rys. Co., 99 Md. 87; Cooke v. Cooke, 41 Md. 369; State v. Gare, 32
Md. 499; Taxicab Co. of Balto, v. Emanuel, 125 Md. 265.

A "next friend" is a party within the meaning of this section, and capable of making
suggestion of removal. Thomas v. Safe Deposit Co., 73 Md. 461; Deford v. State, 30
Md. 198.

Criminal cases not punishable by death.

In criminal cases other than those punishable by death, in absence of proof that
lower court acted arbitrarily and abused, or refused to exercise the discretion vested in
it, its action will not be reversed. Proof held insufficient. Affidavits. Newspaper com-
ments. Downs v. State, 111 Md. 246.

Act of 1874, ch. 304 (amending art. 4, sec. 8, of Md. Constitution) held applicable
where it was in force when traverser's suggestion of removal was filed, although it was
not in force when he was indicted. The requirements of this section not having been
complied with, traverser was not entitled to removal. Smith v. State, 44 Md. 533.
And as to application of act of 1868, ch. 180, see Price v. Nesbitt, 29 Md. 266.

1 This section is identical with art. 4, sec. 8, of Md. Constitution, save that by last
clause of constitutional provision power is given general assembly to modify the existing
law so as to regulate and give force to such provision.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2845   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives