clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2800   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2800 ARTICLE 75

zance, such person, on the return of the execution, may appear and plead
in discharge thereof any plea which would have been good and sufficient to
a scire facias on said recognizance, if a scire facias had issued thereon;
and upon such plea being determined in favor of the person pleading the
same, he shall be discharged from the said forfeiture; provided, such
person shall not be discharged from such execution until the trial of the
plea, unless he shall pay and satisfy the execution or give bond payable
to the State before the sheriff; or enter into recognizance in court with one
good and sufficient security in double the forfeiture and costs due upon
such execution, conditioned to appear and plead in discharge of said
execution and to abide by and fulfil the judgment of the court thereupon.

Whether there is such a record as the execution on recognizance recites, can only
be tried on a plea of nul tiel record under this section. Questions of irregularity in
taking and forfeiting of recognizance cannot be tried on motion to quash execution.
Other matters to be disposed of under plea of nul tiel record. That traverser actually
appeared according to condition of recognizance, is a matter of discharge to be availed
of by plea. Schultze v. State, 43 Md. 305.

This section does not cover a recognizance under art. 87, sec. 40, to pay a fine or
penalty—it only refers to an execution issued on a forfeited recognizance for not
appearing. See notes to art. 87, sec. 40. Albrecht v. State, 132 Md. 159.
Cited but not construed in Roth v. Baltimore Trust Co., 159 Md. 586.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 24. 1912, sec. 20. 1904, sec. 20. 1888, sec. 20. 1856, ch. 112, sec. 94.

1888, ch. 409.

24. It shall be lawful for the defendant, or for one or more of several
defendants, in all actions (except actions for assault and battery, false
imprisonment, libel, slander, malicious arrest or prosecutions for criminal
conversation, or debauching of the plaintiff's daughter or servant), to pay
into court a sum of money by way of compensation or amends; and when
two or more causes of action are joined in one suit or action, it shall be
lawful for the defendants or for one or more of several defendants to pay
into court a sum of money by way of compensation or amends for and on
account of either or all of said causes of action.

Surety on bond to pay demurrage "legally determined" to be due held liable for
interest only from date of decree to date of tender. Effect of tender to stop interest
and entitle surety to costs. Black Diamond S. S. Co. v. Fid. & Dep. Co., 33 Fed.
(2nd), 769.

The effect of a tender and payment under this and the following section is to admit
liability of defendant and to raise as the only issue the extent of such liability. Object
of these sections. The tender and payment may be set up by plea. Where plaintiff
replies that the money paid is not enough to satisfy his claim the court will hold
money until that issue is decided, and then pay to plaintiff so much of it as jury
may find to be due. Costs. How verdict should be rendered. Gamble v. Sentman,
68 Md. 75; Palatine Ins. Co. v. O'Brien, 107 Md. 352. And see Palatine Ins. Co. v.
O'Brien, 109 Md. 111; Crook v. New York Life Ins. Co., 112 Md. 272.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 25. 1912, sec. 21. 1904, sec. 21. 1888, sec. 21. 1856, ch. 112, sec. 96.

1888, ch. 409.

25. The plaintiff, after payment of money into court for and on account
of any cause of action in any suit or action in which said payment shall
be lawful under the provisions of the preceding section shall be at liberty
to reply to the same by accepting the sum so paid into court in full satis-
faction and discharge of the cause of action for and on account of which
said payment shall have been made, and he shall be at liberty in such
case to have his costs taxed, and if they are not immediately paid he shall
have judgment for the costs so taxed; provided, however, that when two
or more causes of action are joined in one suit and payment shall be made
on account of one or more of said causes of action, the costs shall be appor-
tioned by the court; and when any cause or causes of action upon account.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2800   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives