clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2618   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2618 ARTICLE 66

After execution and delivery of a mortgage it is beyond the power of mortgagor, by
his own act, to impair or modify estate conveyed; a sale under mortgage invests pur-
chaser with entire title held by mortgagor at time the mortgage was recorded. Sullens
v. Finney, 123 Md. 657; Smith v. Pritchett, 168 Md. 347.

The title that passes is that of the mortgagee at the time mortgage was recorded, and
not at time of foreclosure. Feigner v. Slingluff, 109 Md. 480; Duval v. Becker, 81 Md.
549; Leonard v. Groome, 47 Md. 504.

This section referred to in construing sec. 10—see notes thereto. Albert v. Hamilton,
76 Md. 307; Warfield v. Ross, 38 Md. 90.

Cited but not construed in Dircks v. Logsdon, 59 Md. 178.

See notes to sec. 6.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 12. 1912, sec. 12. 1904, sec. 12. 1888, sec. 12. 1826, ch. 192, sec. 5.

1836, ch. 249, sec. 8.

13. Upon a sale of such mortgaged premises, any person claiming an
interest in the equity of redemption may apply to the court confirming
the sale to have the surplus of the proceeds of sale, after payment to the
mortgagee of his claim and expenses, paid over to such person, or so much
thereof as will satisfy his claim, and the court shall distribute such surplus
equitably among the claimants thereto.

This section is analogous to right existing on part of subsequent holders of liens,
in regard to sales under usual modes of proceeding in equity. Leonard v. Groome, 47
Md. 504.

This section referred to in determining that a sale will not be set aside because
subsequent incumbrancers are not parties. Chilton v. Brooks, 71 Md. 448.

See notes to sec. 6.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 13. 1912, sec. 13. 1904, sec. 13. 1888, sec. 13. 1826, ch. 192, sec. 4.

1874, ch. 460.

14. After said sale has been confirmed by the court and the purchase
money paid, the person making such sale shall convey the property to the
purchaser, or if the vendor and purchaser be the same person the court
confirming the sale shall, in its order of ratification, appoint a trustee to
convey the property to the purchaser on. the payment of the purchase
money; provided, however, that said trustee shall not give a bond unless
the court shall deem it necessary and prescribe the same in the decree.

Cited but not construed in Hubbard v. Jarrell, 23 Md. 80; Assurance Corp. v. State,
163 Md. 126; Blanch v. Collison, 174 Md. 431.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 14. 1912, sec. 14. 1904, see. 14. 1888, sec. 14. 1825, ch. 203, sec. 8.

15. No title to mortgaged premises derived from any sale made in
virtue of such power and confirmed as aforesaid shall be questioned,
impeached or defeated, either at law or in equity, by reason that the
mortgaged premises were purchased in by the mortgagee or his assignee, or
his legal representatives, or for his benefit or account.

Mortgagee may bid at sale of mortgaged premises as freely and as fully as any other
person, but a sale to him will be scrutinized with care and will be avoided upon slight
evidence of partiality, unfairness or want of the strictest faith. Heighe v. Evans, .164
Md. 270.

General creditor cannot object to sale of property under mortgage. Hannan v. Lyd-
dane, 164 Md. 357.

Subsidiary of mortgagee corporation may purchase encumbered property at foreclosure
sale. Clemens v. Union Trust Co., 170 Md. 532.

Purpose of this section. If mortgagee or his assignee has acquired the property in an
oppressive or unfair manner, sale will be set aside. Read v. Reynolds, 100 Md. 292;
Talbott v. Laurel Bldg. Assn., 140 Md. 568.

This section has no application if the terms in power of sale are different from those
provided by act of 1825, ch. 203, and said provisions are not complied with. Korns v.
Shaffer, 27 Md. 90; White v. Malcolm, 15 Md. 541.

This section applied. Chilton v. Brooks, 71 Md. 452; Dircks v. Logsdon, 59 Md. 179.

This section referred to as showing that mortgagees are given exceptional privileges.
Chilton v. Brooks, 69 Md. 587. :


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2618   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives