clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2262   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2262 ARTICLE 53

In levying distress, outside door cannot be broken open, but may be opened by key,
latch or bolt. An unlawful entry makes distress void and landlord a trespasser ab initio.
Cate v. Schaum, 51 Md. 299. And see Dent v. Hancock, 5 Gill, 120.

No action lies for distraining for more rent than is due, even though it be done
maliciously; contra if more goods are sold than necessary to satisfy true claim and
costs. Hamilton v. Windolf, 36 Md. 306. And see Bonaparte v. Thayer, 95 Md. 5481
Jean v. Spurrier, 35 Md. 110.

Unless law is complied with, proceedings are void. In avowry for rent, warrant and
proceedings under it are facts to be found by jury, and they must appear to be correct.
Giles v. Ebsworth, 10 Md. 344.

A more liberal rule of construction applies to distraint proceedings than to attach-
ments. De Bebian v. Gola, 64 Md. 271.

The affidavit.

A typographical omission in the affidavit, may be cured by the account. Jean v.
Spurrier, 35 Md. 116.

The affidavit is essential. Object of this section. State v. Timmons, 90 Md. 11.

The affidavit is sufficient if it substantially follows this section. Object and general
construction of this section. Cross v. Tome, 14 Md. 257.

Custodia legis.

There can be no distraint of goods in custodia legis. Cromwell v. Owings, 7 H. & J.
58. And see Fisher v. Johnson, 6 Gill, 354.

Property in hands of receivers is not liable to distress without permission of court
having jurisdiction over receivership. Everett v. Neff, 28 Md. 176. And see Cromwell v.
Owings, 7 H. & J. 58.

Landlord has quasi lien on goods upon demised premises for arrearages of rent, and
if attaching creditor has taken the goods, though they cannot be distrained upon,
landlord's lien prevails and he must be first paid out of proceeds of sale. Thompson v.
Baltimore, etc., Co., 33 Md. 319. Cf. Fisher v. Johnson, 6 Gill, 354.

Practice.

Distraint proceedings cannot be amended. The avowant is entitled to open and
close at the trial. Waring v. Slingluff, 63 Md. 55.

Where the warrant is directed to the sheriff, the distress may be levied by a deputy.
Myers v. Smith, 27 Md. 113. Giles v. Ebsworth, 10 Md. 344.

Generally.

Rent is demand of high nature; distress. See notes to art. 66, sec. 32. Calvert Bldg.
Co. v. Winakur, 154 Md. 527.

Status of landlord who has failed to levy distraint before tenant's bankruptcy is that
of a general creditor. Loan Service v. Grossman, 165 Md. 481.

All property, on the demised premises, save such as is exempt by law, is liable to dis-
tress. Giles v. Elsworth, 10 Md. 344. Swartz v, Gottlieb, etc., Brewing Co., 109 Md. 399.
Kennedy v. Lange, 50 Md. 94.

Where goods of stranger are sold under distress, he may buy the goods in and sue
lessee for what he pays, or allow them to be sold and sue lessee for their value. Swartz
v. Gottlieb, etc., Brewing Company, 109 Md. 399.

A landlord resorting to distress, is not entitled to claim interest. Longwell v. Ridinger,
1 Gill, 57; Dennison v. Lee, 6 G. & J. 383.

Where a landlord distrains but leaves property in possession of tenant for an un-
reasonable time, the lien continues as against tenant, but not as against bona fide
purchaser without notice. Lamotte v. Wisner, 51 Md. 559.

A landlord cannot (without good cause) abandon one distress and levy another for
the same rent. Everett v. Neff, 28 Md. 176.

Distress is not within act of limitations. Longwell v. Ridinger, 1 Gill, 57.

A distress is rather a remedy upon the land than on person of tenant, although
tenancy must exist. Howard v. Ramsay, 7 H. & J. 123.

See notes to secs. 10 and 17.

See art. 93, sec. 123, and notes, as to the preference of a claim for rent on which a
distraint might have been issued in the settlement of a deceased tenant's estate. See
also. Longwell v. Ridinger, 1 Gill, 57.

As to proof of a claim for rent due by decedent, see art. 93, secs. 94 and 95.

As to distress against married women, see art. 45, sec. 17.

As to. distress by a purchaser of property for rent, in arrears at the time of the
purchase, see art. 16, sec. 245.

As to distraint upon stallion or jackass stood without.license, see art. 56, sec. 133.

See art. 66, sec. 29.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 10. 1912, sec. 9. 1904, sec. 9. 1888, sec. 9. 1834, ch. 192, sec: 3.

10. To every warrant authorizing any bailiff to levy a distress for
rent there shall be prefixed or annexed the account of such landlord, stating


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2262   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives