clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2038   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2038 ARTICLE 47

under, or the proceeds thereof, to the persons entitled thereto under the
supervision of the equity court having jurisdiction over the same.

This section recognizes right of creditor to proceed under insolvent law after the
recording of the deed of trust. The conventional trustee has no power to set aside a
deed made by a grantor prior to deed of trust, in fraud of rights of creditors, but
insolvent trustee has such fight. Gardner v. Gambrill, 86 Md. 662.

Where a merchant commits acts of insolvency, a subsequent assignment for benefit
of creditors has no effect against insolvent trustee. Willison v. Frostburg Bank, 80 Md.
213 (this section not applicable).

A deed for the benefit of creditors does not require an affidavit by grantee that con-
sideration is true and bona fide. Mackintosh v. Corner, 33 Md. 606.

This section apparently grew out of decision in Riley v. Carter, 76 Md. 581. And
as to law prior to this section, see Pfaff v. Prag, 79 Md. 370; McColgan v. Hopkins,
17 Md. 401.

For deeds for benefit of creditors, conveyances, assignments, transfers, etc., not
involving insolvents, but which were attacked as fraudulent, see Luckemeyer v. Seltz,
61 Md. 313; Matthai v. Heather, 57 Md. 484; Price v. Pitzer, 44 Md. 521; Boyd v.
Parker, 43 Md. 201; Whedbee v. Stewart, 40 Md. 421; Foley v. Bitter, 34 Md. 646;
Crawford v. Austin, 34 Md. 51; Mackintosh v. Corner, 33 Md. 598; Laupheimer v.
Rosenbaum, 25 Md. 219.

For note upon deeds for benefit of creditors, see Kettlewell v. Stewart, 8'Gill, 472.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 35. 1912, sec. 35. 1904, sec. 35. 1898, ch. 355, sec. 4.

37. The provisions of this article shall apply to married women engaged
in business as femes sole.

Prior to the adoption of this section, the law was to the contrary. Clark v. Manko,
80 Md. 82; Relief Bldg. Assn. v. Schmidt, 55 Md. 98.

Cited in dissenting opinion in Tizer v. Tizer, 162 Md. 500.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 2038   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives