Volume 379, Page 1994 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
1994 ARTICLE 45
This section referred to in construing art. 56, secs. 40 and 41—see notes to sec. 41.
Formerly a wife could not sue her husband during coverture at law, though she
Where a husband appropriated his wife's separate estate (held under sec. 7 of Codes
As to how relation of debtor and creditor between husband and wife was established
This section may have grown out of the query in. Barclay v. Barclay, 98 Md. 375
Cited in dissenting opinion in Tizer v. Tizer, 162 Md. 500.
See secs. 5, 15 and 12, and notes.
As to married women taking benefit of insolvent laws, see art. 47, sec. 37.
An. Code, sec. 21. 1904, sec. 21. 1898, ch. 457, sec. 20.
21. Nothing in this article shallbe construed to relieve the husband
This section referred to in deciding that alimony pendente lite would not be allowed
Sec. 5 has no application to contracts made by the wife in accordance with this
The husband is liable under this section for medical attendance upon his wife, for
This section referred to in construing sec. 5—see notes thereto. Lyell v. Walbach,
Cited in dissenting opinion in Tizer v. Tizer, 162 Md. 500.
As to the prevention of the wife from pledging the husband's credit, see art. 16, |
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 379, Page 1994 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.