clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 1137   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS 1137

Escaping from Penitentiary.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 138. 1912, sec. 121. 1904, sec. 111. 1888, sec. 81. 1809, ch. 138,
sec. 2. 1837, ch. 320, sec. 18. 1927, ch. 374.

149. If any offender or person legally detained and confined in the
Penitentiary, or Jail, or House of Correction, or Reformatory, or Station
House, or any other place of confinement, in this State, shall escape, and
if any keeper, deputy, assistant keeper or other person shall aid or assist
in the escape of any offender or person detained and confined, as aforesaid,
he shall, on conviction thereof by the Criminal Court of Baltimore or by
the Circuit Court of the County in which the escape takes place, be sen-
tenced to such confinement in the Penitentiary, or Jail, or House of Cor-
rection, as the Court may adjudge, for not more than ten years.
See sec. 743, et seq.

False Pretenses.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 139. 1912, sec. 122. 1904, sec. 112. 1888, sec. 82. 1835, ch. 319, secs. 1, 2.

150. Any person who shall by any false pretense obtain from any
other person any chattel, money or valuable security, with intent to de-
fraud any person of the same, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being
convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be pun-
ished by fine and imprisonment, or by confinement in the penitentiary
for not less than two years nor more than ten years, as the court shall
award; provided always, that if upon the trial of any person indicted for
such misdemeanor it shall be proved that he obtained the property in ques-
tion in any such manner as to amount in law to larceny or robbery, he
shall not by reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted of such misdemeanor;
and no person tried upon such misdemeanor shall be afterwards liable
to be prosecuted for larceny or robbery upon the same facts; and provided
also, that a mere promise for future payment, though not intended to be
performed, shall not be sufficient to authorize a conviction under this
section.

Indictment and conviction under this section of obtaining money under false pre-
tenses sustained. Deibert v. State, 150 Md. 689.

The offenses of obtaining money by false pretenses and larceny may be joined. Upon
conviction for false pretenses, court competent to impose sentence for three years.
Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 166, 170.

Secs. 150-159 cited in sustaining indictment under sec. 184. State v. Coblentz, 167
Md. 529.

While in indictment under this section the false pretenses intended to be relied upon
need not be set out, indictment in other respects must fully inform accused of the
charge, must enable the court to determine whether facts alleged constitute a crime and
must protect traverser against further prosecution for same offense. This section deals
with a subsisting security and not merely the obtention of a signature to instrument.
The ownership of property or securities should be distinctly alleged, and also that bill
of sale or chattel mortgage was assigned or transferred to traverser by owner, or that
something passed to traverser more than mere paper writing. State v. Blizzard, 70
Md. 390.

A prosecution involving giving of worthless check may still be had under this section,
notwithstanding sec 152. An intent to defraud is necessary under both sections; under
this section the burden of showing such intent is on the state, while under sec. 152
burden shifts to the defendant. Evidence. Lyman v. State, 136 Md. 47.

Indictment is insufficient which, in describing the check alleged to have been used as
a false pretense, does not merely follow the language of the statute but refers indefinitely
to and omits any allegation as to nature or ownership of the "credits, goods and wares."
Armacost v. State, 133 Md. 291.

An indictment under this section upheld; see secs. 651 and 654. State v. Edwards, 124
Md. 594.

An indictment under this section for obtaining "current money" is sustained by
proving the obtention of a check for the sum charged, the check being the means by
which the money was procured. Schaumloeffel v. State, 102 Md. 474.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 1137   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives