clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 1071   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

COURTS , 1071

An. Code, 1924, sec. 37. 1912, sec. 37. 1904, sec. 37. 1892, ch. 353. 1894, ch. 255, sec. 35A.

40. The judges of the court of appeals are authorized to appoint a mes-
senger to the court, and he shall receive one thousand dollars to be paid
to him in quarterly instalments.

Circuit Courts for the Counties.

An. Code, 1924, sec. 38. 1912, sec. 38. 1904, sec. 38. 1888, sec. 36. 1773, ch. 1.
1785, ch. 87. 1804, ch. 55. 1805, ch. 65.

41. The circuit courts for the several counties are the highest com-
mon law courts of record and original jurisdiction within this State, and
each has full common law powers and jurisdiction in all civil and criminal
cases within its county (except where by law the jurisdiction has been
taken away or conferred upon another tribunal) ; and all the additional
powers and jurisdiction given by the 'constitution and by law.

This section referred to in construing art. 23, sec. 415. See notes thereto. Pub. Serv.
Commn. v. Byron, 153 Md. 476.

This section cited, and certain jurisdiction pointed out as having been "taken away."
Main v. Fessler, 89 Md. 469.

For cases involving the act of 1805, ch. 65 (effecting the organization of new courts
after the abolition of the general court), see Price v. State, 8 Gill, 310; Cromwell v.
State, 12 G. & J. 259; State v. Chase, 5 H. & J. 303; Campbell's Case, 2 Bl. 224.

For cases involving the act of 1804, ch. 55 (abolishing the general court), see Steuart v.
Mason, 3 H. & J. 531; The Chancellor's Case, 1 Bl. 599; Price v. State, 8 Gill, 302;
Bell v. State, 4 Gill, 304; Cromwell v. State, 12 G. & J. 260; State v. Dashiell, 6
H. & J. 269.

As to the concurrent jurisdiction of justices of the peace, see art. 52, sec. 12. Cf. art.
52, sec. 6, et seq. ("Justices of the Peace.")

An. Code, 1924, sec. 39. 1912, sec. 39. 1904, sec. 39. 1888, sec. 37. 1852, ch. 16,
secs. 2-4. 1868, ch. 52. 1884, ch. 27.

42. Each of the circuit judges for the counties or judicial circuits may
make orders, in recess of their several courts, in cases of law, and may
require in writing the original papers on any case, or abstracts and tran-
scripts to be produced before them, or either of them, whenever they or
either of them may be, for the purpose of passing such order, and in all
criminal cases wherein the accused has been allowed to give bail; but if
the court shall adjourn before he has secured the bail, the clerk of the
court may take the bail, on its being directed by order of court before
adjournment, or of one of the judges after adjournment, fixing the amount
thereof; but the clerk shall accept no security without the oath or affirma-
tion of the person offering himself as security that he or she is worth the
amount of the bail in real or personal estate, exclusive of his or her right
to exemption, nor unless the clerk shall be satisfied of the truth of such
statement on oath or affirmation; and whenever a party is arrested on
indictment in any of the circuit courts, and is imprisoned during the recess
of the court, any judge thereof, if it be a bailable case, may, by his order
in writing, fix the bail and direct the clerk to take the same, with security
or securities, who shall justify on oath or affirmation as hereinbefore pro-
vided, and no security shall be taken whom the clerk is not fully satisfied
to be worth the amount sworn to.

A judge has the power to direct the entry of a judgment during recess in any court
in his circuit. This section was intended to enlarge the powers of the courts and judges
during recess and has no effect upon, and is not in conflict with, sec. 6 of this article.
The two sections are to be construed together. Frostburg v. Tiddy, 63 Md. 519.

An order in writing passed during recess, overruling a motion for a new trial, is
valid under this section; but a verbal direction sent to the clerk to enter judgment
(out of the presence of the judge), is disapproved. The term "open court," defined.
Hays v. Philadelphia, etc., R. R. Co., 99 Md. 419.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1939
Volume 379, Page 1071   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives