clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
1935 Cumulative Supplement to the Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland
Volume 378, Page 97   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

APPEALS AND ERRORS. 9-7

An. Code, 1924, sec. 31. 1912. sec. 27. 1904, sec. 27. 1888, sec. 25. 1835, ch. 346, sec. 2.

1835, ch. 380, sec. 3. 1841. ch. 11. 1845, ch. 367, sec. 1. 1865, ch. 141.

1920, ch. 274, sec. 27. 1927, ch. 593.

31. An appeal may also be granted in the following cases, to wit: From
any order granting an injunction, or from a refusal to dissolve the same,
or an order appointing a receiver, the answer of the party appealing being
first filed in the cause; from an order dissolving an injunction, or from an
order remedial in its nature adjudging in contempt of court any party to
a cause or any person not a party thereto (except orders passed requiring
the payment of alimony); from an order for the sale, conveyance or
delivery of real or personal property or the payment of money, unless
such delivery or payment be directed to be made to a receiver appointed
by such court; or from any order determining a question or right between
the parties, and directing an account to be stated on the principle of such
determination, or from any order of any court in this State the effect of
which is to deprive any parent, grandparent, or natural guardian of such
child of its care and custody, and upon any such appeal the facts of the
case shall be reviewed as in appeals from final decrees passed by courts
of equity.

Although this section requires answer to be filed before an appeal from order
granting injunction, Court of Appeals is confined to averments of bill of com-
plaint. Sterback v. Robinson, 148 Md. 27. (Decided prior to act 1927, ch. 593. )
State Founders, Inc., v. Oliver. 165 Md. 368.

One cannot accept a decree to the extent it is favorable, and appeal from so
much thereof as did not extend relief to degree desired. Silverberg v. Silver-
berg, 148 Md. 689. (Decided prior to act 1927, ch. 593. )

To third note under heading "Determining a Question, " etc., page 225, vol. 1,
of Code, add Holloway v. Safe Dep. & Tr. Co., 152 Md. 295. (Decided prior to
act 1927, ch. 593. )

As act 1920, ch. 274, added a final clause to this section, the reference in first
and last notes under the heading ''Determining a Question of Right, " etc., page
225, vol. 1, of Code, to "last clause of this section, " should now be to portion of
this section re order "determining a question of right, " etc.

While effect of an appeal under this section from interlocutory order grant-
ing an injunction or appointing a receiver is in some respects analagous to
demurrer! to bill of complaint for a want of equity, there is an important dis-
tinction between them, for in demurrer the test of sufficiency of bill is whether
any part of the relief prayed is justified by averments of bill while in appeal,
the test is whether the averments of bill are sufficient to justify the particular
relief granted by the order. State Founders, Inc., v. Oliver, 165 Md. 380.

There is no appeal under this section from order adjudging one in contempt
if no punishment is imposed. Pocketbook Workers v. Orlove, 158 Md. 505.

32.

On appeal from final decree restraining defendant from operating plant in
way to affect health of neighborhood, previous interlocutory and tentative de-
cree may be reviewed. Washington Cleaners v. Albrecht, 157 Md. 401.

Where final order of ratification without hearing or preliminary order nisi
of auditor's amended report, held that notwithstanding this irregularity of pro-
cedure, as the auditor had already filed two former accounts in same matter,
appeal does not justify reversal under circumstances. Nichols v. McGill, Daily
Record, May 1, 1935.

See notes to sec. 31.

33.

Court may, in its discretion, order that decree shall not be stayed by appeal,
or shall be stayed only upon such terms as court directs. It is absolute duty of
4


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
1935 Cumulative Supplement to the Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland
Volume 378, Page 97   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives