clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
1935 Cumulative Supplement to the Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland
Volume 378, Page 360   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

360 ARTICLE 2V.

Nothing can be made the basis of motion in arrest of judgment which is sub-
ject of demurrer. Act 1916, ch. 30, prohibiting sale of liquor in Washington
County. McCurdy v. State, 151 Md. 440.

Questions raised on demurrers to indictment and plea of limitations cannot
be considered on motion in arrest of Judgment. Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 168.

Indictments—Conclusion of—Joinder of Counts.

554.

In prosecution for bastardy, evidence did not show commission of rape with
sufficient certainty to apply doctrine of merger, assuming that doctrine still
prevails in Maryland. Klein v. State, 151 Md. 491.

This section referred to in construing sec. 3. Larkins v. State, 163 Md. 378.

Indictments—False Pretenses.

555.

To third note to this section on page 1142, vol. 1, of Code, add Simmons v.
State, 165 Md. 160.

This section referred to in sustaining indictment under art. 27, sec. 170.
State v. Coblentz, 167 Md. 529.

Where bill of particulars, under count for obtaining money under false pre-
tenses, failed to give the names of witnesses, held immaterial when admitted
by defendant that such names were furnished him. A bill of particulars fur-
nished as provided by this section is no part of the indictment or pleading, and
if the indictment is in usual form, and not demurrable on its face, does not be-
come so when considered in connection with bill of particulars; nor can defec-
tive indictment be made sufficient by bill of particulars. Delcher v. State, 161
Md. 475.

Cited but not construed in Summons v. State, 156 Md. 384. 392.

Indictments—Forgery and False Pretenses.

558.

Cited but not construed in Summons v. State, 156 Md. 384, 392; Simmons v.
State, 165 Md. 161, 165.

Indictments—Robbery, Larceny, Embezzlement, False Pretenses
Relating to Money.

559.

Bill of particulars not necessary where count charging larceny stated the day
and year, the sum of money taken and its value, the name of the owner and the
felonious taking from owner's possession. Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 160.

Indictments—Arson or Burning.

560. Repealed by ch 255 of the acts of 1929.

Indictments—Selling Liquor.

561.

This section referred to in sustaining indictment for violation of local liquor
law for Washington County. Evidence. Weller v. State, 150 Md. 281.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
1935 Cumulative Supplement to the Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland
Volume 378, Page 360   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  Cannot perform flastmod(): Win32 Error Code = 2

Maryland State Archives