clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Code of the Public Local Laws of Maryland, 1930
Volume 377, Page 1051   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

BALTIMORE CITY. 1051

cannot be filed with the common counts under the Practice Act of Baltimore City.
Murray v. Revel, Daily Record, January 10, 1899.

(5) Declaration. A declaration filed under Act 1886, ch. 184, made before a
Justice of Peace in another state and not having attached to It a certificate of the
Judge of the Court according to the Act of Congress is defective and a judgment of
non pros, will be allowed on motion. Downs v. Appold, Daily Record, October 19,
1892.

(6) The declaration and affidavit must agree, otherwise a motion to strike out
the Judgment will prevail. Griffith v. Graham, Daily Record, July 15, 1891.

Upon demand for Bill of Particulars, defendant entitled to have order extending
time to plead.

Newbold v. Greene, 132 Md. 649. (See Act 1914, ch. 378.)

Pleas were withdrawn and new pleas substituted by permission of Court, to
which plaintiff filed replication and proceeded to trial. Held, that the replication
and the proceeding with the trial amounted to a waiver by the plaintiff of the right
to raise on appeal the question of the correctness of the ruling. The proper course
would have been for the plaintiff to decline to file the replication, and to suffer
judgment by default, from which judgment an appeal can be taken.
Shoop v. F. & D. Co., 124 Md. 130.

1864, ch. 6, sec. 8. 1886, ch. 184, sec. 171. P. L. L. (1888), Art. 4, sec. 168.

313. The plaintiff shall not be entitled to judgment under the preceding
section, unless at the time of bringing his action he shall file with his
declaration an affidavit or affirmation, if the affiant is conscientiously scru-
pulous as to taking an oath, stating the true amount the defendant is
indebted to him, over and above all discounts, and shall also file the bond,
bill of exchange, promissory note or other writing or account by which the
defendant is so indebted; or if the action be founded upon a verbal or
implied contract, shall file a statement of the particulars of the defendant's
indebtedness thereunder. If there are two or more plaintiffs, the said
affidavit or affirmation, may be made by any one of them, or if all the
plaintiffs be absent from the State at the time of the bringing of said
suit, or if the plaintiff be a corporation, the said affidavit or affirmation
may be made by an agent of plaintiff or plaintiffs, or any of them, who
will make further oath or affirmation that he has personal knowledge of
the matters therein stated; and the said affirmation or affidavit may be
made before any of the persons who may take an affidavit or affirmation
to authorize the issuing of a foreign attachment, and may be certified in
the same manner.

Mailhouse v. Inloes, 18 Md. 332. Griffin v. Leslie, 20 Md. 15. Smithson v. The
United States Telegraph Co., 29 Md. 165. Jones v. Freeman, 29 Md. 276. Greff v.
Fickey, 30 Md. 79. State v. Steibel, 31 Md. 37. Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co. of New
York v. Hoeske, 32 Md. 318. McAllister v. Eichengreen, 34 Md. 56. Norris v.
Wrenschall, 34 Md. 499. Canton Nat. Bldg. Ass'n v. Weber, 34 Md. 671. Jones v.
Barnett, 35 Md. 260. Ingallg v. Crouch, 35 Md. 296. Keene v. Whittington & Co.,
40 Md. 497. Loney v. Bailey, 43 Md, 10. McSherry v. Brooks, 46 Md. 122. Mayor
v. Ideson, 47 Md. 542. De Atley v. Senior, 55 Md. 479. Parkhurt v. Citizens Nat.
Bank, 61 Md. 254. The Orient Mutual Insurance Co. v. Andrews, 66 Md. 371
Thorne v. Fox, 67 Md. 67. Thillman v. Shadrick, 69 Md. 528. Gemmill v. Davis,
71 Md. 458. Balto. Pub. Co. v. Hooper. 76 Md. 165. Laubheimer v. Nail, 88 Md.
174. Singer v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 96 Md. 224. Smith v. Hallwood Cash Reg.
Co., 97 Md. 354. Nicholson v. Snyder, 97 Md. 419. Deved v. Carrington, 98 Md.
378. Abbott v. Bowers, 98 Md. 525. Colbourn v. Boulton. 100 Md. 357.

In connection with the provisions of section 313, sec, further, Wilson v. Wilson,
8 Gill, 192. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. Hoffman Steam Coal Co., 22 Md. 499.
Warwick v. Chase, 23 Md. 154. Evesson v. Selby, 32 Md. 345. The Universal Life-
Ins. Co. v. Bachus, 51 Md. 31. Horner v. Plumley, 97 Md. 271. Dipscomb v. Zink
151 Md. 431. Fick v. Towers, 152 Md. 336.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Code of the Public Local Laws of Maryland, 1930
Volume 377, Page 1051   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives