clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2967   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

TESTAMENTARY LAW. 2967

Generally.

The jurisdiction of orphans' court is limited to inquiries relative to the probate,
such as testamentary capacity, fraud, undue influence and execution of the will.
Courts of law and equity must determine what passes under will, and questions of
title dependent upon operation and effect of will, and decide upon right of dis-
position. Schull v. Murray, 32 Md. 15. And see Ramsey v. Welby, 63 Md. 588; State
v. Warren, 28 Md. 356; Blackburn v. Craufurd, 22 Md. 466; Michael v. Baker, 12
Md. 169; Spencer v. Ragan, 9 Gill, 482.

Orphans' courts are courts of special limited jurisdiction, and are confined to letter
of their authority. They must exercise their powers in accordance with law, and
necessary jurisdictional facts must not be left to inference but must affirmatively
appear upon face of their proceedings. This section referred to in construing art. 21,
sec. 83—see notes thereto. Norment v. Brydon, 44 Md. 116; Taylor v. Bruscup, 27
Md. 225; Lowe v. Lowe, 6 Md. 352; Conner v. Ogle, 4 Md. Ch. 452.

This section does not militate against authority of orphans' court to determine
who are next of kin and entitled to distribution under sec. 243—see notes thereto.
Blackburn v. Craufurd, 22 Md. 466. Cf. Ramsey v. Welby, 63 Md. 588; State v.
Warren, 28 Md. 356.

The orphans' court has no jurisdiction to determine validity and amount of claims
due creditors, although such claims may be passed for payment. Levering v. Lever-
ing, 64 Md. 413; Schwallenberg v. Jennings, 43 Md. 559; Bowie v. Ghiselin, 30 Md.
556; Miller v. Dorsey, 9 Md. 323.

The orphans' court has no jurisdiction to pass on title to personal property except
under sec. 253 on a charge of concealment by administrator. How other questions
of title to personal property may be determined. Fowler v. Brady, 110 Md. 208.

This section construed in connection with art. 16, sec. 99. The jurisdiction of
orphans' court closes when executor has fully settled his accounts; hence said court
has no jurisdiction thereafter to pass upon title to real estate sold by a trustee who
is also executor. Equity alone can enforce a trust. Blumenthal v. Moitz, 76 Md.
566. And see Taylor v. Bruscup, 27 Md. 219; Gable v. Cheston, 51 Md. 380.

The orphans' court has no jurisdiction to determine question of sanity of appli-
cant for letters—see sec. 57 and notes. Kearney v. Turner, 28 Md. 425.

An order of court directing property remaining in hands of administrator to be
paid over to certain parties without notice, etc., provided in sec. 148, held invalid
under this section. Conner v. Ogle, 4 Md. Ch. 451.

The orphans' court has no jurisdiction to decree return to administrator of goods
taken by surety under order of court, counter security having been demanded and
not given. Right of action in such case. Scott v. Burch, 6 H. & J. 79.

The orphans' court has no jurisdiction upon ex parte application of a widow, to
order a sale of real estate devised to her for life and after her death to be sold by
executors. Snook v. Munday, 90 Md. 702.

Thev orphans' court has no jurisdiction where a petition merely alleges the in-
sertion in inventory of property which belongs to petitioner. Spencer v. Ragan, 9
Gill, 482.

Orphans' court has inherent power to correct by revocation, etc., errors into which
it has fallen. In re Stratton, 46 Md. 553; Raborg v. Hammond, 2 H. & G. 51.

The orphans' court has no power to adjust equities resulting from the vacating of
a sale. Eichelberger v. Hawthorne, 33 Md. 596.

This section referred to in deciding that letters of administration granted where
there is an executor named in will not disqualified and not excluded from acting in
conformity with law are void. Kane v. Paul, 14 Pet. 33.

This section referred to as indicating that a final account so far as debts are con-
cerned must be stated before orphans' court can order legacies paid or distribution
made. Lowe v. Lowe, 6 Md. 355. C}. Clarke v. Sandrock, 113 Md. 422.

This section referred to in discussing commissions allowed for a partial adminis-
tration. In re Estate of Baxley, 47 Md. 560.

This section referred to in construing sec. 10—see notes thereto. Gunther v. State,
31 Md. 31.

This section referred to in construing sec. 170—see notes thereto. Thaw v. Falls,
136 U. S. 519.

Re. jurisdiction of orphans' court over real estate, see secs. 299 and 302 and notes.

Re. power of orphans' court to order resale in case purchaser defaults, see sec. 301.

Re. jurisdiction of orphans' court to order money brought into court or invested,
see sec. 251.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2967   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives