Volume 375, Page 273 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
ASSIGNMENT OF CHOSES IN ACTION. 273
The person to whose use a judgment has been entered, may prosecute a sci. fa.
An assignment may be not only by the original plaintiff in a judgment, but also See notes to sec. 1.
An. Code, sec. 3. 1904, sec. 3. 1888, sec. 3. 1829, ch. 51. 1830, ch. 165, sec. 3.
The assignee of a non-negotiable chose in action takes it subject to all legal and
If the obligor pays the debt to the assignor without notice of the assignment, he
Only such claims can be set off against the assignee of a chose in action as
An assignment may be made not only by the original plaintiff in a judgment, but
This section, as well as the entire act, shows a purpose to extend the right of
This section applied. Goldsborough v. Cradie, 28 Md. 487; Job v. Walker, Cited but not construed in Hampson v. Owens, 55 Md. 586. As to the assignee of a claim against the state, see art. 95, secs. 14 and 15. An. Code, sec. 4. 1904, sec. 4. 1888, sec. 4. 1830, ch. 165, sec. 2. 1880, ch. 161, sec. 4.
4. When the legal plaintiff in any suit entered for the use of any person
An assignment may be made not only by the original plaintiff in a judgment, An. Code, sec. 5. 1904, sec. 5. 1888, sec. 5. 1763, ch. 23, sec. 7.
5. The surety in any bond or other obligation for the payment of money
This section enlarges the right of the surety; under it, he is entitled to have an
The design of this section was to place a surety in the same position as the
The entire debt must be paid, as there can be no pro tanto assignment. Neptune |
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 375, Page 273 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.