SALES AND NOTICES. 2695

93. Enforcement of right, duty, etc., de- clared by uniform sales act. 94. Cases not provided for in said act. 95. Construction of act. 96. Application of act, limited. 97. Definition of terms. 98. No retroactive operation.

99. Cited as uniform sales act. Sales in Bulk. 100-103. What deemed; regulation of. 104. False statement under sec. 100; pen- alty.

Sales Under Execution.

An. Code, sec. 1. 1904, sec. 1. 1888, sec. 1. 1810, ch. 160, sec. 1.
1. Any sheriff or other officer to whom any execution may be directed
may seize and expose to sale any legal or equitable estate or interest which
the defendant named in such writ may have or hold in any lands, tenements
or hereditaments.

Executions.

Property held as tenants by the entirety cannot be seized and sold on a judgment
against husband. Judgments create liens on land only because it is liable to be seized
and sold upon execution. Jordan v. Reynolds, 105 Md. 294; Coombs v. Jordan,
3 Bl. 284.

Where real estate is devised to a trustee to collect income and pay it " into A's
hands and not into another, whether claiming by his authority or otherwise," such
income cannot be, reached in hands of trustee by creditors of cestui que trust
Smith v. Towers, 69 Md. 77. (See, however, dissenting opinion, page 98.)

Where an officer sells under an execution, he must first effect an actual seizure.
The land seized must be so described that it may be ascertained and located, other-
wise seizure and sale are void. Dorsey v. Dorsey, 28 Md. 393.

A valid fi. fa. upon an absolute judgment against an administrator or executor
can be levied under this section upon his lands, as well as upon his goods and
chattels. Beall v. Osbourn, 30 Md. 11.

The equitable interest of a judgment debtor in a term for years is liable to seizure
and sale by analogy to this section. An equitable estate in personal chattels is not
so liable at law. Shryock v..Morris, 75 Md. 79. And see Hollida v. Shoop, 4 Md. 475.

Prior to this section equitable interests were liable in equity to be sold for debt.
Miller v. Allison, 8 G. & J. 38.

Prior to this section the interest of a mortgagor in lands was liable to be attached,
condemned and sold under a fi. fa. Ford v. Philpot, 5 H. & J. 312.

Generally.

This section cannot be nullified by an injunction at the instance of a senior lien
holder. Union Bank v. Poultney, 8 G. & J. 333.

This section held to be applicable to a sale made before its passage, but ratified
thereafter. Coombs v. Jordan, 3 Bl. 322.

Cited but not construed in Wright v. Ryland, 92 Md. 661 (dissenting opinion);
Tuck v. Calvert, 33 Md. 222; Hall v. Jones, 21 Md. 446; Watkins v. Dorsett, 1 Bl. 533;
Morsell v. First National Bank, 91 U. S. 361; Smith v. McCann, 24 How. 398;
VanNess v. Hyatt, 13 Pet. 294.

See notes to sec. 2.

As to the preference of taxes in the proceeds of sales by ministerial officers, see
art. 81, sec. 74.

See art. 26, sec. 20; art. 52, sec. 59, et seq., and art. 87, sec. 12, et seq.

An. Code, sec. 2. 1904, sec. 2. 1888, sec. 2. 1794, ch. 60, sec. 10. 1810, ch. 160, sec. 2.
2. Any person who shall purchase any equitable estate or interest in
any lands, tenements or hereditaments which may be sold under the pre-
ceding section shall be entitled, upon payment of the purchase money, to
an assignment of conveyance of such equitable interest, to be made by the