clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2643   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

REVENUE AND TAXES. 2643

This section referred to in deciding that manufacturing machinery was not assess-
able as part of realty—see notes to secs. 166 and 166A. Anne Arundel County v.
Baltimore Sugar Refining Co., 99 Md. 486.

As to property exempt from taxation, see sec. 4; see also secs. 166 and 166A.

An. Code, sec. 165. 1904, sec. 162. 1888, sec. 144. 1878, ch. 178, sec. 152.

170. As soon as the state tax commission shall have valued and as-
sessed the shares in the several banks and other corporations in this State
it shall certify and return the said valuation to the comptroller of the
treasury, who shall at once proceed to notify the president, cashier or other
proper officer of such banks or other corporations of the said valuation
and assessment of their shares, respectively, by transmitting to such presi-
dent or other officer an account of the state taxes due from such bank
or other corporation under such valuation and assessment, by mail under
cover, fairly directed to such president or other officer, and shall note in
a book the date of placing in the mail the envelope or cover containing
such account. If no appeal be taken within thirty days from such trans-
mission the said valuation and assessment shall be final; but any such
bank or corporation may, within thirty days after such notification, appeal
from such valuation to the comptroller of the 'treasury and state treas-
urer, stating in such appeal the reasons and grounds of such appeal; and
said comptroller and treasurer shall consider the same, and if the comp-
troller and treasurer shall both be of the opinion that such valuation and
assessment so made by the state tax commission is erroneous and ought
to be changed, they shall change the same accordingly and the valuation
and assessment so agreed upon by the comptroller and treasurer shall be
final; but if either the comptroller or treasurer shall agree with the state
tax commission as to the correctness of the valuation so made by it, then
such appeal shall be dismissed, and the original valuation shall be and
remain as the true valuation of such shares.

Since this section makes decision of comptroller and treasurer final, court 'of appeals
cannot revise their judgment or amount of assessment. Relief may be granted by
court of appeals, however, if property is assessed which is exempt, or if legality of
method of valuation is involved. And if property is taxed which is not taxable, the
corporation may resist collection of tax without appealing to comptroller and
treasurer. Salisbury Bldg. Assn. v. Wicomico County, 86 Md. 618; Schley v. Lee,
106 Md. 404; Schley v. Montgomery County, 106 Md. 410; Consolidated Gas Co. v.
Baltimore, 101 Md. 558; Clark Distilling Co. v. Cumberland, 95 Md. 475; Crown
Cork and Seal Co. v. State, 87 Md. 697; Consumers' Ice Co. v. State, 82 Md. 139;
Allegany County v. Union Mining Co., 61 Md. 548. Cf. Baltimore v. Canton Co., 63
Md. 238.

If value of distilled spirits is included in the assessment of corporate stock contrary
to see. 229, et seq., this section affords the remedy—see sec. 232. If distilling company
omits to avail itself of such remedy, circuit court will not afterwards review action
of tax commissioner. The shareholders have an opportunity to be heard through
corporation, and, hence, shareholders themselves are not entitled to notice of increased
assessment—for this purpose, corporation represents shareholders. Clark Distilling
Co. v. Cumberland, 95 Md. 474; Corry v. Baltimore, 96 Md. 321 (affirmed in 196
U.S. 466).

Prior to act of 1900, ch. 320—see sec. 232—this section had no application to valu-
ation fixed by tax commissioner on distilled spirits under sec. 229, et seq. Monticello
Co. v. Baltimore, 90 Md. 431.

This section referred to in construing secs. 2, 166 and 166A—see notes thereto.
Crown Cork and Seal Co. v. State, 87 Md. 696; American Coal Co. v. Allegany
County, 59 Md. 196.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2643   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives