PLEADINGS, PRACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW. 2403
fair and impartial trial in the court in which the same may be pending,
the said court shall order and direct the record of proceedings in such
suit or action, issue, presentment or indictment, to be transmitted to some
other court having jurisdiction in such case for trial; but in all other
cases of presentment or indictment pending in any of the courts of law in
this State having jurisdiction thereof, in addition to the suggestion in
writing of either of the parties to such presentment or indictment that
such party cannot have a fair and impartial trial in the court in which
the same may be pending, it shall be necessary for the party making such
suggestion to make it satisfactorily appear to the court that such sugges-
tion is true, or that there is reasonable ground for the same; and there-
upon the said court shall order and direct the record of proceedings in
such presentment or indictment to be transmitted to some other court hav-
ing jurisdiction in such cases for trial; and such right of removal shall
exist upon suggestion in cases when all the judges of said court may be
disqualified, under the provisions of the constitution, to sit in any such
case; and said court to which the record "of proceedings in such suit or
action, issue, presentment or indictment may be so transmitted, shall hear
and determine the same in like manner as if such suit or action, issue,
presentment or indictment had been originally instituted therein.1
When right of removal applies.
This section has no application to cases in equity, or in the orphans' court. Cooke
v. Cooke, 41 Md. 367.
Right of removal can only be exercised in courts having original jurisdiction.
Geekie v. Harbourd, 52 Md. 461; Cooke v. Cooke, 41 Md. 367; Hoshall v. Hoffacker,
11 Md. 363.
Right of removal does not apply to proceedings instituted under statute for
forfeiture of chartered franchises. Belair Club v. State, 74 Md. 300.
This section does not apply to issues framed in insolvency proceedings at instance
of creditor. Trayhern v. Hamill, 53 Md. 91; Michael v. Schroeder, 4 H. & J. 227.
Up to what time case may lie removed.
Right of removal must be exercised before trial commences, and an amendment
of declaration does not affect such right; but fact that one trial has already been
had ending in a disagreement by jury, does not defeat right of removal. Cooke v.
Cooke, 41 Md. 367; Sittig v. Bi'rkestack, 38 Md. 161; Deford v. State, 30 Md. 196.
A case may be removed at any time before panel of jurors is completed by being
sworn. McMillan v. State, 68 Md. 309; Price v. State, 8 Gill, 297. Cf. Griffin v.
Leslie, 20 Md. 19; Taxicab Co. v. Emanuel, 125 Md. 265.
Where a judgment by default has been entered, and nothing remains to be done but
to assess damages or determine the amount thereof, the case cannot be removed.
Northern Central Ry. Co. v. Rutledge, 41 Md. 372.
Who may remove.
Right of removal resides in parties plaintiff or defendant, and not in each of
several plaintiffs or defendants, the word " parties " being used in a collective sense.
Baltimore County v. United Rys. Co., 99 Md. 87; Cooke v. Cooke, 41 Md 369;
State v. Gare, 32 Md. 499; Taxicab Co. of Balto, v. Emanuel, 125 Md. 265.
A " next friend " is a party within the meaning of this section, and capable of
making suggestion of removal. Thomas v. Safe Deposit Co., 73 Md. 461; Deford v
State, 30 Md. 198.
1 This section is identical with art. 4, sec. 8, of Md. Constitution, save that by last
clause of constitutional provision power is given general assembly to modify the existing
law so as to regulate and give force to such provision.
|
![clear space](../../../images/clear.gif) |