clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2366   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2366 AETIOLE 75.

(70) That the defendant was not entitled to the said way over the
plaintiff's land, as the defendant has alleged.

(71) That the alleged trespass was not a use by the defendant of the
said way.

(72) That the defendant was not within the age of twenty-one years,
as alleged.

(73) That the alleged deed was not delivered as an escrow, as alleged.

(74) That the defendant was not, and is not now, the wife of one W.
T., as alleged.

(75) That the defendant did not make the alleged deed by duress, as
alleged.

(76) That the alleged deed was not procured by the fraud of the plaintiff.

(77) That the defendant did not commit the alleged assault in his own
defense.

New Assignment.

(If the plaintiff replies and new assigns, the new assignment may be
as follows):

(78) The plaintiff, as to the ———— and ———— pleas, says, that he
sues not for the trespasses therein admitted, but for trespasses committed
by the defendant in excess of the alleged rights, and also in other parts
of the said land and on other occasions, and for other purposes than those
referred to in the said pleas.

The plea of new assignment is used with especial propriety in cases of trespass,
q. c. f., where defendant pleads a right of way, and plaintiff desires to prove that
acts complained of were in excess of such right. Plea held sufficient under this and
two following sub-sections. Haines v. Haines, 104 Md. 213.

(79) And the plaintiff, as to the ———— and ——— pleas, further says,
that he sues not only for the trespasses in these pleas admitted, but also
for, etc.

(If the plaintiff replies and new assigns to some of the pleas, and new
assigns only to the others, the form may be as follows) :
See note to sub-sec. 78.

(80) And the plaintiff, as to the ———— and ———— pleas, further says,
that he sues not for the trespasses in the ———— pleas (the pleas not replied
to) admitted, but for the trespasses in the ———— pleas (the pleas replied
to) admitted, and also for, etc.
See note to sub-sec. 78.

Pleas in Abatement.

(81) That the plaintiff, at the time of issuing the summons in this case
was and still is the wife of one R. B.

Pleas in abatement cannot be amended—see sec. 47.

(82) That the plaintiff is within twenty-one years of age; and has
declared by attorney, when he should have declared by next friend or
guardian.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2366   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives