|
PLEADINGS, PRACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW. 2359
(9) The good will of a business of the plaintiff sold and given up by
the plaintiff to the defendant.
(10) The defendant's use, by the plaintiff's permission, or messuages
and lands of the plaintiff.
(11) The hire of (as the case may be) by the plaintiff let to hire to
the defendant.
(12) Freight for the conveyance by the plaintiff for the defendant, at
his request, of goods in a ship.
(13) The demurrage of a ship of the plaintiff kept on demurrage by
the defendant.
The following forms, with the commencement and conclusion before
stated, shall be sufficient:
(14) That the defendant, on the ——— day of ———, by his promissory
note, now overdue, promised to pay to the plaintiff $——— sixty days after
date, but did not pay the same.
This sub-section referred to in construing art. 13, secs. 43, 47, 77, and 33 and 14—
see notes to sec. 47. Shaffer v. Bond, 129 Md. 659.
(15) That one A. on, &c. (date), by his promissory not, now overdue,
promised to pay to the defendant, or order, $——— sixty days after date;
and the defendant endorsed the same to the plaintiff; and the said note
was duly presented for payment and was dishonored, whereof the defendant
had due notice, but did not pay the same.
(16) That the plaintiff, on, &c. (date), by his bill of exchange, now
overdue, directed to the defendant, required the defendant to pay to the
plaintiff $——— sixty days after date; and the defendant accepted the said
bill, but did not pay the same.
(17) That the defendant, on, &c. (date), by his bill of exchange
directed to A., required A. to pay to the plaintiff $——— sixty days after
date; and the said bill was duly presented for acceptance, and was dis-
honored, of which the defendant had due notice, but did not pay the same.
(18) That the plaintiff and defendant agreed to marry one another,
and a reasonable time for such marriage has elapsed, and the plaintiff has
always been ready and willing to marry the defendant, yet the defendant
has neglected and refused to marry the plaintiff.
For breach of promise cases, see Lewis v. Tapman, 90 Md. 294: Sauer v. Schulen-
berg, 33 Md. 288.
(19) That the plaintiff and defendant agreed by charter party that the
plaintiff's ship called the " Daniel Webster " should with all convenient
speed sail to L., or so near thereto as she could safely get, and that the
defendant should there load her with a full cargo of coffee, or other lawful
merchandise, which she should carry to B., and there deliver on payment
of freight $——— per ton, and that the defendant should be allowed ten
days for loading, and ten days for discharge, and ten days for demurrage,
if required, at $——— per day; and that the plaintiff did all things necessary
on his part to entitle him to have the agreed cargo loaded on board the ship
at L., and that the time for so doing has elapsed, yet the defendant made
default in loading the agreed cargo.
|
 |