clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 203   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

APPEALS AND ERRORS. 203

From the refusal of the court to allow a defendant to plead " limitations " to a
declaration which the court has allowed the plaintiff to amend. Schulze v. Fox, 53
Md. 43.

From an order overruling a motion to strike out an unauthorized appearance of,
and pleas filed by, an attorney for a garnishee in an attachment. Albert v. Albert,
78 Md. 348.

Where a decision is made which injuriously affects the claim of a trustee for com-
missions. White v. Malcolm, 15 Md. 541.

From the judgment of the county court reversing their former judgment, and
for costs. Hawkins v. Bowie, 9 G. & J. 428.

From the judgment of a court in setting aside an award made by referees to
whom the case was referred under rule of court. Garitee v. Carter, 16 Md. 309.
See also Hickley v. Stewart, 12 G. & J. 456.

A creditor may appeal from'an order finally discharging an insolvent. Waters v.
Momenthy, 68 Md. 172.

From an order quashing an indictment. State v. Hodges, 55 Md. 127.

From every decision which settles a matter of right, be the decision adverse or
by consent or default. Chesapeake Bank v. McClellan, 1 Md. Ch. 330.

Where a case is tried before the court without a jury an appeal lies from the action
of the court on matters of law. Tinges v. Moale, 25 Md. 484.

Interlocutory matters.

No appeal lies in the following cases:

From an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer. Griffee v. Mann, 62
Md. 253; Wheeler v. State, 7 Gill, 34.

From an order sustaining a demurrer to a replication. Dietrich v. Swartz, 41
Md. 196.

From judgment overruling pleas in a criminal case, and granting permission to
answer the indictment. Clare v. State, 30 Md. 164.

From an order overruling a motion for judgment by default. Smithson v. United
States, etc., Co., 29 Md. 162.

From an order overruling a motion to quash an attachment, filed after the return
day. Parkhurst v. Citizens', etc., Bank, 61 Md. 259; First National Bank v. Weckler,
52 Md. 30; Mitchell v. Chestnut, 31 Md. 527; Baldwin v. Wright, 3 Gill, 242.

From an order allowing an amendment of a voucher in an attachment case. Booth
v. Callahan, 97 Md. 319.

Where the plaintiff voluntarily suffers a non-pros., and no final judgment is en-
tered. Boyd v. Kienzle, 46 Md.. 301; State v. Bryan, 3 Gill, 388.

From an order overruling a motion to quash a writ. Welsh v. Davis, 7 Gill, 365;
Gambrill v. Parker, 31 Md. 1.

From an order overruling a motion to quash a writ of error coram nobis. Briden-
dolph v. Zeller, 3 Md. 325.

From an order granting leave to file a bill of review. Meyer v. Steuart, 48 Md.
423.

From an order consolidating cases. Mitchell v. Smith, 2 Md. 271.

From an order not settling the rights involved, and not denying the means of
further prosecuting or defending the suit. Hazlehurst v. Morris, 28 Md. 67; Boteler
v. State, 7 G. & J. 109.

For other examples of matters from which no appeal lies because they are inter-
locutory, see League v. State, 36 Md. 264; Magraw v. Munnikhuysen, 35 Md. 29;
Gittings v. State, 33 Md. 461; McArthur v. Martin, 1 Gill, 259.

Matters in the discretion of the lower court.

No appeal lies in the following cases:

From an order refusing or granting leave to amend the pleadings. Thorne v.
Fox, 67 Md. 67; Griffee v. Mann, 62 Md. 254; Deford v. State, 30 Md. 198; Calvert
v. Carter, 18 Md. 108.

From an order allowing an amendment of the voucher in an attachment case.
Booth v. Callahan, 97 Md. 319.

From the action of the court on. a motion for a new trial. Zitzer v. Jones, 48 Md.
115; Baltimore, etc., Ry. Co. v. Sewell, 35 Md. 238; Sauer v. Schulenberg, 33 Md.
288; Waters v. Waters, 26 Md. 53. See also Hughes v. Jackson, 12 Md. 450.

From the action of the trial court in allowing a remittitur. Post v. Bowen, 35 Md.
235; Baltimore v. Reynolds, 18 Md. 270.

From a decision setting aside a verdict. Kierle v. Shriver, 11 G. & J. 405.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 203   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives