clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 1693   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

HUSBAND AND WIFE. 1693

Limitations.

Act of 1892, ch. 267 (prescribing a period of limitations), cannot be construed
retroactively, as in that case it would be unconstitutional. Where a creditor sues
within three years from the adoption of said act, he is not barred as to conveyances
executed prior to act. Manning v. Carruthers, 83 Md. 7.

A suit to set aside a deed to husband and wife as tenants by the entireties must
be brought within three years. Stieff Co. v. Ullrich, 110 Md. 633.

Art. 57, sec. 14, held no answer to the application of the portion of this section
providing that creditors must assert their claims within three years, where deeds
were recorded nine days after their execution, and wife did nothing to keep plaintiff
in ignorance of transfer. Wilson v. Vandersall, 134 Md. 482. And see James v.
Murray, 142 Md. 108.

A husband may not under this section withhold a deed to his wife from the
records for three years or more and be protected by the three-year limitation in
this section; the deed must be attacked within three years from date it is recorded.
Deed, mortgage and transfer set aside. See notes to art. 21, sec. 19. James v. Murray,
142 Md. 108.

Where bill of complaint shows that plaintiff did not assert his claims within three
years from the passing of property from husband to the wife, and no reasonable
explanation is given of delay, bill is demurrable. Nimmo v. Blick, 128 Md. 328.

Reasons for delay in attacking a conveyance of property from husband to wife
under this section, held insufficient, Dixon v. Dixon, 128 Md. 5.

Generally.

Where husband and wife are joint tenants, husband's interest is liable to be sold
in execution during wife's life. Fladung v. Rose, 58 Md. 24.

This section (as it stood prior to Code of 1888), recognized right of a married
woman to become a purchaser and hence, her purchase of property at a trustee's
sale may be enforced—see art. 16, sec. 224. Fowler v. Jacob, 62 Md. 328.

Where house owned by husband and wife as tenants by the entireties is damaged
by fire and husband refuses to allow insurance money to be used in repairing
property, equity may grant relief by appointing a receiver; procedure. Nature of
tenancy by the entireties. Secs. 1 and 2 of art. 45 of Code of 1860, and sec. 1 of art.
45 of Code of 1888, and that section as amended by act of 1892, ch. 267, and sec. 2
of that article as amended by act of 1890, ch. 394, dealt with. Masterman v. Master-
man, 129 Md. 170.

Under this section and sec. 4, a married woman may hold property acquired after
her marriage as her separate estate, and a husband may convey property directly
to his wife. Grantor's intention that whole estate conveyed to husband and wife
should vest in survivor. Lang v, Wilmer, 131 Md. 224.

Act of 1898, ch. 457, has no application to a deed executed before that act took
effect (January 1, 1899). Construing together secs. 2, 3 and 11 of art. 45 of Code of
1860, while a married woman could not convey her property without the joinder
of her husband, she could join with her husband in conveying such property to latter
as trustee. Statute of Uses. Brandau v. McCurley, 124 Md. 244.

This article referred to in deciding that a husband who has received sufficient of
his wife's money to pay off an indebtedness for which he has become surety, must
be regarded as reimbursed. Nihiser v. Nihiser, 127 Md. 461.

The object and effect of the acts originally composing this section, discussed.
Schindel v. Schindel, 12 Md. 121.

Cited but not construed in Allers v. Forbes, 59 Md. 376.

As to right of the husband (where wife is entitled to division or election under
art. 46) to elect in right of his wife, see art. 46, sec. 24.

As to fraudulent conveyances, see art. 39B.

An. Code, sec. 2. 1904, sec. 2. 1892, ch. 586, sec. 20. 1898, ch. 457, sec. 2.

2. Whenever any interest or estate of any kind in any property, real,
personal or mixed, situate, lying or being within this State, has been or
shall hereafter be sold, conveyed, assigned, mortgaged, leased, transferred
or delivered by any husband, directly or indirectly to his wife, and has
been or shall hereafter be subsequently sold, conveyed, assigned, mortgaged,
leased, transferred or delivered by such wife and husband during their

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 1693   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives