clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1918
Volume 374, Page 277   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
ART. XXXV] EVIDENCE. 277
ARTICLE XXXV.
EVIDENCE.
Public Statutes, Office Copies and
Official Certificates.
53. United States and State statutes,
and those of Great Britain, how
offered in evidence.
56. Certified copies of extracts of
deeds, mortgages, etc., transmit-
ted by clerks to commissioner of
land office, to be evidence.
Competency of Witnesses.
1.
See notes to article 16, section 168.
3.
The act of 1902, chapter 495, did not except pending cases from its
operation; that act, however, did not re-enact the provisions of the act of
1888, chapter 315, but made a very radical change in the law by which a
party to a contract is permitted to testify where the other party is dead,
except in actions by or against executors or administrators in which judg-
ments or decrees may be rendered against them. Hence where a suit was
instituted in 1897, a man who was not then a competent witness, became
competent under the act of 1902. The act of 1904, chapter 661, provided
that it should not apply to pending cases. Harford Natl. Bank v. Rutledge,
124 Md. 54.
This section does not make a husband incompetent to testify to transac-
tions between his wife and a decedent in a suit by her against such dece-
dent's estate because the husband might be benefited by the plaintiff's recov-
ering. Marx v. Marx, 127 Md. 383.
Evidence required to be excluded under this section. This section was
passed to prevent injustice being done and not to cause it, if that can be
avoided. Cacy v. Slay, 127 Md. 496.
Cited but not construed in Elosser v. Fletcher, 126 Md. 251.
4.
The portion of this section providing for the corroboration of the plain-
tiff's testimony in a suit for divorce, held to prevent a decree. Tomkey v.
Tomkey, 130 Md. 295.
5.
The application of this section pointed out. Cacy v. Slay, 127 Md. 500.
7.
Evidence held admissible in accordance with the last sentence of this
section. Murdock v. Schindel, 128 Md. 641.


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1918
Volume 374, Page 277   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives