clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1914
Volume 373, Page 141   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 5] APPEALS FROM COURTS OFLAW. 141

1914, cb. 110.

9A. The fact that a prayer or instruction which refers in general
terras to the pleadings, was granted or refused by the Court below, shall
not be sufficient to show that the point or question of a variance between
the pleadings and the evidence was tried and decided in the Court below,
as required by section 9; and the question of such variance shall not be
considered as having been raised by any prayer or instruction below,
unless such prayer or instruction shall state specifically the points
wherein it is claimed that such variance exists.*

See article 75, section 91, and article 5, section 18.

10.

Though a petition, affidavit and exhibits appear in the record, since they
are not set out or contained in the bill of exceptions as required by this
section and section 80, they will not be reviewed. Cochrau v. State, 119
Md. 548.

12.

As to the cost of records, see article 36, section 12A.

13.

As to the cost of records, see article 36, section 12A.

14.

As to the cost of records, see article 36, section 12A.

15.

To the second note to this section on page 130 of volume 1 of the Anno-
tated Code, add the case of Noel Construction Co. v. Armored Concrete Co.,
120 Md. 256.

17.

The application of the last clause of this section, denied. Parks v.
Griffith, 117 Md. 504.
See notes to section 15.

18.

See section 9A.

19.

To the second note to this section on page 141 of volume 1 of the Anno-
tated Code, add the case of Noel Construction Co. v. Armored Concrete Co.,
120 Md. 256.

20.

See notes to section 19.

22.

Where a count, in a declaration was technically bad, but an instruction
that there was no evidence legally sufficient under the pleadings to entitle
the plaintiff to recover was apparently based on grounds which the Court
of Appeals did not concur in, the case was affirmed but remanded for a new
trial under this section. Tyng v. Woodward, 121 Md. 438.

Cited but not construed in Stewart Taxicab Co. v. Getz, 118 Md. 176.

*In effect September 1, 1914.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1914
Volume 373, Page 141   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives