|
ART. 35] PUBLIC RECORDS——JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. 987
As to lost deeds, see sec. 56.
As to proof of foreign debts and other instruments, see sec. 40, et seq.
See also, sec. 67.
As to the admissibility in evidence of certified copies of foreign wills, and
as to wills not required (by a foreign law) to be recorded, see art. 93, sec.
351, et seq.
1906, ch. 26.
65. A copy of any books, papers, entries or proceedings belonging
to the office of the state tax commissioner, attested by the state tax
commissioner, shall be received as evidence in any court of law or
equity, or before any judge, justice of the peace or other tribunal in
this State, in the same manner and to have the same effect as if the
original books, papers, entries or proceedings were themselves produced.
1904, art. 35, sec. 65. 1888, art. 35, sec. 60. 1860, art. 37, sec. 59. 1817, ch. 119.
66. Copies of judgments, decrees or other judicial proceedings not
required to be recorded, made by any of the clerks from the papers,
docket entries and minutes of the court, certified by such clerk under
the seal of his office, shall be evidence.
See sec. 44 and notes to sec. 64.
Ibid. sec. 66. 1888, art. 35, sec. 61. 1890, ch. 318.
67. In any suit, action or proceeding at law now depending or
hereafter to be instituted in any of the courts of law of this State
wherein a transcript of the record of any cause in any other court in
this State might be offered in evidence it shall be sufficient to produce
the original papers and proceedings in said last mentioned cause,
together with a transcript under seal of the docket entries therein and
offer the same in evidence and the same when so produced and offered
in evidence shall have the same effect to all intents and purposes as a
transcript of the record under the seal of the court wherein the same
are, and such production may be had by any party to a suit, action
or proceeding upon a subpoena duces tecum, issued on the special order
of the court in which the same is pending to the clerk of the court
wherein such docket entries, original papers and proceedings may be.
This section applied. Johnson v. Johnson, 105 Md. 89; Miller v. Matthews,
87 Md. 474.
This section held not to apply to the introduction in evidence of original
papers from one court of Baltimore city in a case pending in another court
of said city—see the act of 1898, ch. 123 (Baltimore city charter), section
388. Calvert Bank v. Katz, 102 Md. 62.
As to the production in evidence of the original of a will, see art. 93, sec.
355.
|
 |