ART. 93] SALES. 2135
if it were personal estate in his hands; in case the purchaser of any
such real estate has transferred, or shall transfer his said purchase to
another person, it shall be lawful for the orphans' court, upon petition
in writing by the original purchaser and such assignee and upon being
satisfied that such substitution or transfer may be made without injury
to the estate, to pass an order substituting such assignee as purchaser
of the said real estate, upon such terms as may be deemed expedient,
regard being had to the interests of the estate, and directing the execu-
tor to convey the said real estate to the said assignee, his heirs and
assigns; provided, however, that it shall not be necessary to tho validity
of the sale of any such real estate by the executor that the same be
ratified by the orphans' court, as aforesaid, in any case where a court
of equity of competent jurisdiction has assumed jurisdiction in rela-
tion to the sale of any such real estate.
Application of this section.
A power of sale held to have been given executors, and this section
applied. Seeger v. Leakin, 76 Md. 510.
An alleged implied power of sale in a will, denied. Porterfleld v. Porter-
field, 85 Md. 664: Young v. Twigg, 27 Md. 630; cf. Ogle v. Reynolds, 75 Md.
150.
This section has no application unless tho executor is authorized to sell
real estate. Alther v. Barroll, 22 Md. 510. And see Dent v. Maddox, 4 Md.
530.
This section has no application to a sale made before it became operative.
Harlair v. Brown, 2 Gill, 479.
Executor is quasi trustee.
In sales under this section the executors are quasi trustees. They are
entitled to nothing more than their commission. If by dealing with the
assets the executors make a profit, they must account to the cestui qui trusts.
Gephart v. Strong, 20 Md. 527.
This section has no application unless the executor is authorized to .sell.
Such authorization is a naked trust for the fulfillment of which the execu-
tor is subject to the control of the orphans' court. Alther v. Barroll, 22 Md.
510.
Ratification of sale.
In passing upon the ratification of the sale, the orphans' court has Jurisdic-
tion to determine whether the will gives the exec tor power to sell. Ogle v.
Reynolds, 75 Md. 151.
If an order of ratification has been procured by fraud or misrepresentation,
the orphans' court has power to rescind within a reasonable time and under
proper circumstances. Montgomery v. Williamson, 37 Md. 427.
Generally.
Section 284 has no application to real estate directed to be sold as pro-
vided in this section. Brooks v. Bergner, S3 Md. 354.
A sale under this section is a judicial one, and the statute of frauds has
no application. Warehlme v. Graf, 83 Md. 101.
When the sale is ratified by the orphans' court, it stands in respect to its
enforcement in other tribunals on the same footing as an ordinary contract
of sale, the orphans' court having no power to enforce its execution. Gar-
ter v. Von Bokkelen, 73 Md. 179.
The Jurisdiction of the orphans' court extends no further than confirm-
ing or rejecting the sale; it does not include the adjusting of equities result-
ing from vacating the sale. Eichelberger v. Hawthorne, 33 Md. 595.
This section does not interfere with the concurrent jurisdiction of equity.
Wright v. Williams, 93 Md. 69: Ogle v. Reynolds, 75 Md. 151; Keplinger v.
Maccubbin, 58 Md. 212; Long v. Long, 62 Md. 77 (dissenting opinion).
135
|