ART.93] DISTRIBUTION. 2075

shall be allowed; and there shall be no distinction between the whole
and half-blood.

Where nephews are living, grand-nephews do not take, nor do children of
first cousins where first cousins are living. The word "descendants" as used
in this section construed in connection with section 128. The term "col-
laterals" defined. Suman v. Harvey, 114 Md. 241; Hoffman v. Watson, 109
Md. 554; McComas v. Amos, 29 Md. 128. And see note (a), Seecamp v.
Hammer, 2 H. & G. 11; Duvall v. Harwood, 1 H. & G: 474; Robins v. State,
1 H. & G. 477.

The last clause of this section applied. Seekamp v. Hammer, 2 H. & G.
13.

The last clause of this section held inapplicable because there was no con-
version of real estate into personalty . (See article 46, section 19.) Keller
v. Harper, 64 Md. 82.

See notes to sec. 127.

See notes to art. 46, sec. 27.

As to relations of the whole and half-blood, cf. art. 46, sections 19, 20 and
26.

1904, art. 93, sec. 130. 1888, art. 93, sec. 131. 1860, art. 93, sec. 132. 1798, ch,

101, sub-ch. 11, sec. 12.

131. If there be no collaterals, a grandfather may take, and if there
be two grandfathers, they shall take alike, and a grandmother, in case
of the death of her husband, the grandfather, shall take as he might
have done.

Ibid. sec. 131. 1888, art. 93, sec. 132. 1860, art. 93, sec. 133. 1798, ch.
101, sub-ch. 11. sec. 13.

132. If any person entitled to distribution shall die before the same
shall be made, his or her share shall go to his or her representatives.

This section applied. Schaub v. Griffin, 84 Md. 563.

This section referred to in deciding that a next of kin can only make title
to a distributive share through an administrator. Neale v. Hagthrop, 3
Bl. 565.

Ibid. sec. 132. 1888, art. 93, sec. 133. 1860, art. 93, sec. 134. 1798, ch.
101, sub-ch. 11, sec. 14.

133. Posthumous children of intestates shall take in the same man-
ner as if they had been born before the decease of the intestate, but no
other posthumous relation shall be considered as entitled to distribution
in his or her own right.

This section means that children of an intestate born after his death shall
take as if born before, but no other relation born after his death shall be
entitled to take as distributee in his own right. A nephew in esse before
the intestate's death is entitled to take in the right of his father although
born after his father's death, provided the father died before the intestate.
Shrlver v. State, 65 Md. 283.

This section referred to in deciding that a next of kin can only make title
to a distributive share through an administrator. Neale v. Hagthrop. 3
Bl. 565.

See art. 46, sec. 25.

Ibid. sec. 133. 1888, art. 93, sec. 134. 1860, art. 93, sec. 135.
1825, ch. 156.

134. The illegitimate child or children of any female, and the
issue of any such illegitimate child or children shall be capable to