Volume 372, Page 1646 View pdf image (33K) |
1646 PLEADINGS, PEACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW. [ART. 75
76. That the alleged deed was not procured by the fraud of the plain-
77. That the defendant did not commit the alleged assault in his own New Assignment.
(If the plaintiff replies and new assigns, the new assignment may be
78. The plaintiff, as to the and pleas, says, that he The plea of new assignment is used with especial propriety in cases of trespass, q. c. f., where the defendant pleads a right of way, and the plaintiff desires to prove that the acts complained of were in excess of such right. Plea held sufficient under this and the two following sub-sections. Haines v. Haines, 104 Md. 213.
79. And the plaintiff, as to the and pleas, further
(If the plaintiff replies and new assigns to some of the pleas, and
80. And the plaintiff, as to the and pleas, further Pleas in Abatement.
81. That the plaintiff, at the time of issuing the summons in this case Pleas in abatement can not be amendedsee sec. 43.
82. That the plaintiff is within twenty-one years of age; and has
83. That the said contract in the declaration mentioned was made
[This form shall be sufficient, whether the contract be by parol or
This sub-section does not affect the rule that where a debt is due to a |
||||
Volume 372, Page 1646 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.