clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History by Alan M. Wilner
Volume 216, Page 94   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

94 Board of Public Works

Beginning in 1951, however, the General Assembly backed away from this ap-
proach and left it to the board to determine how much revenue was needed to meet
debt service obligations. Uniformly thereafter, in each bond bill the legislature di-
rected the subdivisions to levy and collect a state property tax at the rate certified by
the Board of Public Works and empowered the board, in turn, to compute the rate
required to produce the necessary revenue.62

The actual power to substitute surplus and other tax revenues for the property
tax, delegated for a two-year period in 1941, was renewed in 1945 but does not appear
to have been repeated since.63 In 1953 the legislature attempted to achieve that end
in another way—by requiring the governor to include funds for debt service in his
annual budget—but the Court of Appeals declared the method an unconstitutional
infringement of the governor's discretionary authority in preparing the state budget.64

The board's role in setting the state property tax rate is not entirely ministerial.
Its authority over the timing of bond sales and the approval of construction contracts,
coupled with the reversion of unexpended capital appropriations to the annuity bond
funds, gives it some flexibility in managing debt service requirements. No doubt the
most significant determinants in establishing the property tax rate, however, are the
absolute level of debt service and the extent to which, by grace of the governor and
the General Assembly, appropriations are made to the annuity bond fund through the
state budget.65

By 1943 the panic that had led the board to consider moving the state archives
to abandoned mines had dissipated, and planning commenced for postwar construction.
In that year the General Assembly created a Commission on Post-War Reconstruction
and Development, charging it with formulating "a program of public work projects to
be commenced on the cessation of the present war" and making "definite recommen-
dations" to the Board of Public Works for the allocation of funds for postwar construc-
tion.66

It is implicit from the 1943 act that the legislature was envisioning a major pro-
gram embodying both state and local projects. Its focus, according to the act, was not
only on the need for the improvements themselves but also on the need to assure an
orderly transition to civilian employment for the men and women who would be re-
leased from the armed services. Although the board was empowered to monitor the
workings of the commission in some respects—to approve expenditures and select all
architects and engineers employed to do preliminary planning work for the commis-
sion, for example—its major role would be to receive, consider, and act upon the com-
mission's ultimate recommendations.

The board was affected in two major ways by this program. Its sheer magnitude—
ultimately well over a quarter billion dollars—obviously placed a considerable burden
on the board merely to keep up with the routine superintendence of the projects.

62. Acts of 1951, ch. 412. This procedure was approved by the attorney general in an opinion letter to Sen.
Louis L. Goldstein. 39 Op. Atfy Gen. 272 (1954).

63. The revenue picture was especially good in 1945. The legislature reduced the personal and corporate
income tax for 1944 and 1945 by one-third (Acts of 1945, ch. 794) and authorized the board to apply any
surplus revenues that exceeded appropriations by more than $2 million either to a reduction in the real
property tax or to a further credit against the income tax (Acts of 1945, ch. 762). The board opted for both
and thus effected a 50 percent reduction in income taxes and a 1 cent (10 percent) reduction in the property
tax. See BPW Minutes, 17 October 1945, 6:453.

64. McKeldin v. Steedman, 203 Md. 89 (1953).

65. In fiscal year 1981, $58 million was appropriated to debt service through the state budget. The state
property tax produced just under $89 million. See "Statement of the Revenues and Expenditures of Public
Money for the Year Ending 30 June 1981," printed as an appendix to Acts of 1982.

66. Acts of 1943, ch. 981.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History by Alan M. Wilner
Volume 216, Page 94   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives