clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History by Alan M. Wilner
Volume 216, Page 47   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

The Reign of the Commissioners: 1851-1864 47

In this same resolution the General Assembly viewed the secession of the southern
states as final and irreconcilable, and it asked the government to recognize that fact,
to "accept the olive branch which is held out to [the president], and in the name of
God and of humanity, to cease this unholy and most wretched and unprofitable strife"
and especially to remove its troops from Maryland soil.49

At the same time, by resolution 2, the legislature commissioned Outerbridge Hor-
sey of Frederick to proceed to Richmond and negotiate with Virginia "for the protection
of the citizens of Maryland from injury in person or property, by any unadvised act
of the military forces of Virginia, and their compensation for any already done." Six
weeks later the legislature learned that Confederate troops had been destroying the
dams, locks, canal boats, and other property belonging to the C & 0 Canal Company,
and, by resolution 8, formally requested from the state of Virginia "full recompense
for all property destroyed."

The political sentiment expressed in resolution 4 as to the legitimacy and finality
of secession soon changed. As noted, the Unionists had become organized on a statewide
basis and were given significant support by the Lincoln administration and the troops
it commanded. This was particularly manifest on election day in November 1861. The
Unionists had nominated candidates for governor and the General Assembly and ap-
parently for the two positions on the Board of Public Works then expiring. The military
authorities, seeking to assure a Unionist victory, stationed soldiers at the polling
places and through arrests, intimidation, test oaths, and other coercive devices dis-
suaded many people from exercising their franchise. The election, says J. Thomas
Scharf, was "a shameless mockery, and its results were but the work of fraud and
violence."50

The result was the intended one. Augustus W. Bradford, the Unionist candidate,
was elected governor (defeating the States Rights candidate Benjamin C. Howard, the
prominent Baltimore countian and delegate to the 1850-51 Constitutional Conven-
tion), and his party gained control of the General Assembly. It also elected two com-
missioners to the board—Frederick Fickey, Jr., of Baltimore City, and Edward Shriver
of Frederick County.51

The General Assembly that convened in December 1861 was of quite different
persuasion from its immediate predecessor. It repudiated the doctrine embodied in
resolution 4 and expressed, in various resolutions of its own, its rejection of the notion
that states had the right to secede. It stated instead the view that the war "has been
forced upon the government of the United States, by the seditious and unlawful acts
of those who have attempted its overthrow by violence." In sharp contrast to the res-
olutions adopted nine months earlier, the legislature conveyed the people's "approval
of the course and policy of the President in the conduct of the war thus far." The only
fear, or caveat, was that Lincoln, pressured by northern agitation, might interfere
with the institution of slavery in Maryland. To that end the legislature protested all
schemes to excite insurrection among the slaves, regretted attempts to abolish slavery
in the District of Columbia, and asked the president "to resist and rebuke all attempts,

49. Ibid. See also res. 13, adopted 22 June 1861, requesting the state's two U.S. senators to "vote for an
immediate recognition of the independence of the government of the Confederate States of America." Res.
14 and 15 expressed a clear recognition of the sovereign right of a state to secede, urged the immediate
cessation of hostilities, and protested in the strongest terms certain arbitrary actions on the part of the
military.

50. J. Thomas Scharf, History of Maryland from the Earliest Period to the Present Day (Baltimore: John B.
Piet, 1879; reprint, Hatboro, Pa.: Tradition Press, 1967), 3:460. Compare Duncan, "Era of the Civil War,"
pp. 354, 355.

51. Fickey was a merchant, deeply committed to the Union cause and to Freemasonry. His service on the
board did not interrupt his political activity. In August 1862 he was one of three commissioners in Baltimore
City responsible for implementing Lincoln's draft of militiamen, and in October he was an unsuccessful
candidate for mayor of Baltimore.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History by Alan M. Wilner
Volume 216, Page 47   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives