clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History by Alan M. Wilner
Volume 216, Page 103   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

102 Board of Public Works

the General Assembly passed Senate joint resolution 10 requesting a study by the
Department of Legislative Reference of the board's responsibilities. The resolution
called attention to the considerable expansion in the board's duties since 1864 and
concluded that by reason of that expansion the board's agenda "is so lengthy and
complex it is difficult for sufficient time to be given to the many major decisions which
the board is required to make." Perhaps unaware of the various studies already made,
from the Sobeloff-Stockbridge Commission in 1952 through the ad hoc committee only
a month or two earlier, the resolution also recited, as a reason for undertaking yet
another study, that "there has been no overall study or review of the responsibilities
of the Board of Public Works."10

The study authorized by the resolution was conducted by the Department of Fiscal
Services, an arm of the legislature, and centered on a computer search of all references
to the board in the state code (1,068 spread among 161 sections) and an analysis of
four actual board meetings. The report was made to the Joint Budget and Audit Com-
mittee, which then sought comments on it from a variety of state officials. Not sur-
prisingly, the consensus of their comments was very much in accord with what the
previous investigative groups had recommended. Still no action was taken, either
legislatively or administratively. This failure was given critical comment in the leg-
islative auditor's 1976 report.11

It was in the 1976 legislative session that the seeds of substantial revision were
finally planted, although it took five years for them to germinate. The impetus was
a bill by a freshman delegate to abolish the board and to transfer its functions to the
various cabinet departments. The bill never emerged from the Committee on Consti-
tutional and Administrative Law to which it had been referred, but it produced enough
interest to generate House joint resolution 145 calling for a broader study of the board's
functions. That study, undertaken by a gubernatorial task force created pursuant to
the resolution, produced a comprehensive report in October 1977 that (1) collected and
summarized all of the board's constitutional and statutory duties, (2) made a series
of twenty-three specific recommendations to delegate certain of those duties to other
agencies and to "clean up" obsolete and inconsistent code references to the board, and
(3) proposed a new management plan to improve the administrative efficiency of board
operations.12

Some legislative changes, minor in nature, were made in the 1978 session of the
General Assembly along the lines suggested in the task force report, but the major
recommendations were not immediately implemented. Pressure was building, how-
ever, and it soon was joined into a confluence with demands from other quarters for
revisions in the law and procedure governing state procurement and contracting. The
result was the enactment in 1980 of a comprehensive new law on state procurement
of supplies, services, and construction. This act, having a one-year delayed effective
date, made or authorized a number of substantial changes in procurement practices
generally and board procedures in particular, and that prompted yet another study.13

This final study to date, ordered by the governor in December 1980, was under-
taken in light of the new law and was completed in March 1981.14 It dealt primarily
with the delegation, mostly conditional or partial, of board authority over low-cost or
routine items that, for the first time, was authorized by statute. A more detailed

10. The resolution appears as joint res. 18 in the Acts of 1974.

11. Department of Fiscal Services, Study of the Board of Public Works (Annapolis, 9 July 1974), p. 17;
Department of Fiscal Services, 1976 Audit Report, Board of Public Works (Annapolis, March 1976), State
Department of Legislative Reference, Annapolis.

12. H. Jour. (1976), p. 587; Report of the Task Force to Study the Functions of the Board of Public Works
(Annapolis, October 1977), MdHR 789550.

13. Acts of 1980, ch. 775.

14. Governor's Task Force on State Procurement Regulations, Subcommittee on Delegation of Board of
Public Works Authority, "Report of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations," 6 March 1981, State
Department of Legislative Reference, (hereafter Governor's Task Force on Procurement Report).


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Board of Public Works: A History by Alan M. Wilner
Volume 216, Page 103   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives