| Volume 211, Page 2324 View pdf image (33K) |
|
1874.] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES. 1081
NEGATIVE. Hines, Speaker, Kemp, Joyce, Bond, Grafton, Groh, Colton. Lee, Fenton, Henkle, Dawson, Berry, Robinson, McCosker, Stake, Nutwell, C. R. Hamilton, Clark, Matthews, McWilliams, Fletchall, Merryman, Foster, Vanderford, Turner, of B. co., Staylor, Brown, Seth, Stewart, of B. city, Maclin, Sudler, Hart, Stewart, of How'd, Hodson, Greenfield, Leonard, Davis, Harig, West—41. Thompson,
So the amendment was rejected.
Section 1, line 134, strike out (as unconstitutional) the
The question recurring upon concurring in the amendment, AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
Substitute for the proposed amendment the following :
Under the head of "Miscellaneous," line 136, strike out
The question recurring upon the amendment submitted by Mr. Brace demanded the yeas and nays. The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows :
AFFIRMATIVE.
Bond, Keech, Latchford, |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 211, Page 2324 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.