846 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 17,

Mr. Watkins submitted the following amendment:
AMENDMENT PROPOSED.

Sub-section 3, strike all after the word ''Baltimore," in
line 15, to the word "all," in line 16.

Which was adopted.

Mr. Maclin submitted the following amendment:

Section 3. The provisions of the preceding section shall
not apply to property belonging to the United States, to this
State, or to any county or incorporated city or town of this
State, to houses of public worship, with the grounds appurte-
nant thereto and necessary for the use thereof, all grave-
yards and cemeteries, crops and products of lands in the
hands of the producer or his agent, provisions for the use and
consumption of the person to whom the same shall belong,
and his family, working tools of mechanics, where the value
does not exceed fifty dollars, where worked exclusively by
hand, wearing apparel of every description, fish at the
time fishermen may be employed in catching, salting and
packing the same, or while they remain in their possession
or that of their agents, unsold, all' judgments or notes,
securities and other property belonging to any bank or other
incorporated institution of this State, paying its taxes on
its shares of capital stock.

Which was rejected.

Mr. Seth submitted the following amendment:

AMENDMENT PROPOSED.

Sub-section 3, line 15, of printed bill, insert after the
words "City of Baltimore," the following words: "The Ma-
sonic Temple, in the City of Baltimore, and the lot on which
it stands."

The question recurring upon concurring in the amendment,

Mr. Seth demanded the yeas and nays.

The demand being sustained.

The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs.

Hines, Speaker, Grafton, Gill,
Henkle, Lee, Loane,
Robinson, McCosker; Greenfield,
Seth, C. R. Hamilton, McColgan,
Gordy, McWilliams, Harig,
Etchison, Stewart, of B. city, Brace—19.
Latchford,