Volume 211, Page 2029 View pdf image (33K) |
786 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 13, Valliant, Koons, Park, Coulbourn, Miller, Brace, Duer, A.nnan, Galt, Davis, Loane, Maclin—27.
NEGATIVE.
Bond, Robey, Joyce, So the first proposed amendment was rejected. The question then recurring, upon the second proposition, Being the second proposed amendment, Tt was rejected.
Mr. Turner, of Baltimore county, moved that the further
The question then recurring upon sustaining the motion, The question then being, "Shall the main question be now put? " Mr. Koons demanded the yeas and nays. The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Bond, T. H. Hamilton, Groh, |
||||
Volume 211, Page 2029 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.