clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Court Records of Prince George's County, Maryland 1696-1699.
Volume 202, Preface 99   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INTRODUCTION xcix

Question for our private satisfaction of any persons therein Concerned untill the Cause
be fully argued and pleaded by die atturneys or suitors etc. and that in their argueing
debateing and pleadeing the[y] observe this methode, First the plaintife or him upon
whom the affirmative matter Rests and lyes stand up and make his argument, produce
his authorityes or Witnesses and Examine them without any Interruption or hinderance
of the other party unlesse by leave of the Court hee have any objection to the legallity
or Qualification of an Evidence or the like and that at the discretion of the Court and
rarely admitted not without substantiall and reall matter. That done the plaintife or
affirmant is to sitt down, the defendant or adverse part to stand up make his argument
Examine his Evidence, and if hee will Cross Examine the plaintifes Evidence or putt
any necessary question to them, which done the plaintife or affirmant may Cross Ex-
amine the adverse party or Wittnesses and the defendant after to Conclude his argu-
ment and then the plaintife or affirmant to stand up make his Concludeing argument
upon the whole Cause and soe the Cause to be shutt up and Closed as to the atturneys
or suitors pleadeing of it, And then the Court (vizt) the Chiefe Judge to give the Jury
their Charge if a Jury Cause and send them from the barr; and if tryed by the Court
then the Court to Consider of their Judgement and if occasion require to debate the
matter among them without any Interruption of Either atturney or suiter, And if any
atturney or suiter shall presume to breake this Rule or Methode Either by interrupting
one another or an Evidence or by disturbeing or offerring any thing to the Judges or
any of them while they are in Judgement unlesse thereto required by the Court they
shall be fined for Every such offense one hundred pounds of tobaccoe: etc. 55

A few laws contained provisions as to evidentiary requirements. A 1692 enact-
ment (An Act Providing what shall be good Evidence to prove Forreign Debts)
made comprehensive provision for the method of proving foreign debts—those
owing to persons in England and other places outside the province. A 1695 act laid
down the conditions under which an ordinary keeper might recover judgment on a
bill, bond or other security taken for accounts charged in his book. Under an act
governing the fencing of corn fields against strays, two "indifferent witnesses" were
required to judge the sufficiency of the fencing, to witness the giving of warning
after the first offense and to judge the quantum of damage necessary to confer juris-
diction on the county courts (200 pounds of tobacco) in actions of trespass. An act
regulating the making of tobacco hogsheads provided that in actions by the ag-
grieved party the matter of fact was to be proved "by two good and Sufficient Evi-
dences." 56 No general requirement of two witnesses in civil causes is evident from
the Liber.

Presumably Quakers taking the affirmation were allowed to give evidence in

55. CCCR, Liber S, No. 1, 63. Cf. the rule in the Baltimore County Court which read as follows
(BCCP, Liber G, No. 1, 557): "Ordered that upon every Action brought upon Tryall in this Court
the Plaintiff by himselfe or Attorney if any doe first open the Cause and produce their Witnesses
to prove their Charge who shall be by the Court appointed when to Offer what the[y] have to give
in Evidence after which by the appointment of the Court the Defendant by himselfe or his At-
torney if any shall Offer what they have to Give in Barr to the Action aforesaid and produce their
Witnesses who shall be by the said Court appointed when to give in their Evidences aforesaid
which being done the Plaintiff or his Attorney (if any as aforesaid) shall proceed to sum up the
Evidence and Answer the Objections made by the defendant after which noe further debate shall
be of the matter in question but the Court thereupon proceed to giving in the Charge The like
method to be Observed in all Causes and Controversies Tryable and determinable by the Court
Only That noe person or persons Plaintiffs or Defendants by themselves or their Attorneyes do
presume to Contradict or Interrupt the Adverse party in any Allegation by him made or matter
of thing Offered but that in all such Cases he or they make their Observations and Offer what
they have against it at their proper time of Speaking under the Penalty of Fifty pounds of tobacco
for every default towards the defraying of the Commissioners Expences."

56. 13 MA 502; 38 id. 46; 13 id. 472; 2,2 id. 477; 19 id. 104.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Court Records of Prince George's County, Maryland 1696-1699.
Volume 202, Preface 99   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives