clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Court Records of Prince George's County, Maryland 1696-1699.
Volume 202, Preface 67   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INTRODUCTION lxvii

educated according to their estates or properly taught their trades as apprentices.
Commissioners were also authorized to demand increased security from guardians
of orphans upon learning of the commission of waste upon the real property in the
estate or to remove such guardians and appoint others in their place. As to orphans
in the care of executors, the justices were to report to the Deputy Commissary if
they found the securities likely to be insolvent or the orphans ill-used. 18

While the commissions to the justices of the county court excluded jurisdiction
in matters involving title to land, a 1699 act provided that the justices might grant
a warrant of resurvey and a venire for a jury, if required, where the reason for the
resurvey was only the ascertaining of bounds according to the provisions of the act.
In addition, this act provided that in certain cases persons holding land not accu-
rately described in their patents might have to reimburse other persons attempting
to take up such lands for the reasonable charge of their survey upon petition or
motion to the county court, the first taker being called and heard by the court be-
fore judgment and award of execution by fieri facias or attachment.19

A 1697 act empowered the commissioners of the several counties to acquire the
lands upon which the several court-houses were located, specifying the procedure to
be employed in evaluating and surveying the lands in case the owner was unwilling
or incapable of selling. A similar procedure was authorized in the event the vestry
of any parish sought lands for a church or chapel. 20

Certain administrative duties were also imposed upon the justices by the Gover-
nor and Council. In July 1696, for example, upon complaint of the "very Great
abuse done to the Countrey through the Constables remissness and Negligence in
taking the List of Taxables," it was ordered that the sheriffs give notice to the
justices at the August county courts "that they issue their strict Order and Charge
forthwith to the Constable of each hundred within their respective Counties,
thereby Commanding them to goe to every individuall house of the said hundreds
in which they Officiate and there Demand, and take an Account from the Master,
Mistress or Dame of every such house in writing, under such Master and Mistress
or Dames own hand what number of Tithables they have." These lists were to be
returned under seal by certain specified dates, "under pain of being prosecuted,
to the Utmost Severity of the Law for Contempt." 21

On October 8, 1696 Robert Bradley and Robert Tyler, two of the Prince Georges
County justices, pursuant to summons, appeared before the Council Board to ex-
plain why the court had disobeyed the above order. Bradley stated "that he was
not any ways knowing thereof nor ever heard the said Order Read." Tyler said that
"Mr. Holiday the Cheif Justice acquainted the Court that there was an Order of
the Governor and Councill for taking a New list of Taxables but he Aded that the
Lists had been taken already pursuant to the directions of the Law and thereupon
Ordered the Clerk for to Enter an Order that no such order of their Court should

18. 13 id. 430, 498; 22 id. 533; 38 id. 41. C/. the May 1695 report of the Committee of Grievances
of the House of Burgesses that the Commissary was neglecting to make reports to the several
justices on orphans' estates. 19 id. 183-84. In March of each year the justices in each county were
to transmit to the deputy commissary the current price of tobacco to be allowed executors and
administrators in making up their accounts. 38 id. 43.

19. See 22 id. 481-94. When the Council suggested that copies of the bill be sent to the jus-
tices of the county courts for their opinion thereon, the House remarked that "for the referring
of a Matter of soe great importance to the Justices of the resspective Counties and to such a popu-
lar approbation it is feared that the True intent and meaning thereof will be strained according to
the Private Interest of Severall Private persons contrary to the true intent and meaning of the
said bill." 22 id. 321-22, 324-26, 404-05.

20. 19 id. 589, 592. For operation of the law in Prince Georges County see infra 248-49.

21. 20 MA 471.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Court Records of Prince George's County, Maryland 1696-1699.
Volume 202, Preface 67   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives