clear space clear space clear space white space
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 70   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
clear space clear space clear space white space
Fought and Dear Bought, which was laid out on the 21st of April,
1788, laid to the northward of them both, and extended entirely
from the one to the other; and that the tract called Jolly's First
Attempt, which was laid out in the year 1791, laid to the south-
ward of them; and, in like manner, extended from the one to the
other. The certificate of Jolly's First Attempt, calls for a black
oak, at one point, a white oak at another, and a white oak at a
third; which calls having been shewn and proved by witnesses,
the lines of that tract were extended to those boundary trees ac-
cordingly, as the law required, whereby that tract has not only been
made to border upon, but, to some extent, to interlock with the
tract called Long Fought and Dear Bought, so as to leave not the
least vacancy contiguous to Litten's Fancy, over which a resurvey
could be extended from it, so as to embrace any part of M'Caus-
land's First Attempt.
But Patterson and Ellicott, to impeach the testimony of the wit-
nesses produced by M'Causland to prove the call for the marked
black oak, the going to which brings those two elder tracts
together, and closes the access to M'Causland's First Attempt,
shew, that the black oak, of which the witnesses speak, is that
which is designated as a marked black oak in the certificate of
Jolly's First Attempt, bearing date in the year 1791; and that in
a block, so cut out of that tree as to include the whole of the only
chop mark upon it, there appears to have been added, by natural
growth, only twelve concentric layers of wood outside of, and since
the chop mark was made. They exhibited this block to the court
as evidence; alleging, that, according to the regular and uniform
course of nature, there is in all trees one such concentric layer
of wood always formed every year. And, therefore, they con-
tended, that the irresistible presumption was, that the black oak,
shewn by those witnesses, upon the resurvey, could not have re-
ceived the chop mark so long ago as the year 1791, when the tract
called Jolly's First Attempt was laid out; and, consequently, could
not be the marked black oak called for in the certificate of that
tract; and that call being thus clearly disproved, the lines of that
tract must, so far, be laid down by course and distance; and in
that mode of locating it, there would be left a considerable space
of vacancy along which the resurvey of Litten's Fancy might be
extended, as it had been, so as to take in the whole of the tract
M'Causland's First Attempt.
3d December, 1830,—BLAND, Chancellor.—This case standing

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 70   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  

This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives