clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 652   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
652 THE CAPE SABLE COMPANY'S CASE.
eighthly, Because it declares, that Lechleitner and Troost are not
respectively, or in any way to be considered as partners of The
Cape Sable Company, or of the persons composing the association
incorporated as The Cape Sable Company; or that any agreement
of them, or either of them exists as stated.
Leonard Foreman, Benjamin Welsh, and James N. Sangston,
rely on the first, second, third, and fourth exceptions of Lechleit-
ner; and aver, that their respective claims are fully proved, and
are not barred by the statute of limitations.
Gerard Troost relies on the first, second, third, fourth, and
eighth exceptions of P. G. Lechleitner; and also excepts to it,
because it insists, that his claim ought to be lessened by any
deduction for capital, additional capital, or negro capital; and
because of its denying the sufficiency of his vouchers fully to sus-
tain his claim.
And William O'Hara also excepted to this report, other than so
much of it as relates to the judgment claims. First. Because they
are not proved according to law. Secondly. Because they never
had any legal existence, Thirdly. Because they are barred by
limitations. And he also relies on all the objections made by the
auditor against the claims therein mentioned.
The claim of Philip G. Lechleitner for an allowance out of the
proceeds of sale for certain fixtures to which he asserted a right,
and which were included with the property sold, having been
referred to arbitration, the arbitrators returned an award; which,
by an order passed on the 27th of April, 1831, was finally ratified
and confirmed.
After which the auditor made another report, bearing date on
the 19th of May, 1831, in which he says, that he had, at the in-
stance of William O'Hara, stated an account between the trustees
and the estate of The Cape Sable Company, whereby the proceeds
of sale are applied to the payment of the trustees' allowance for
commissions, the costs of this suit, the claim of William O'Hara
for poundage fees, as directed by the order of the 15th of Decem-
ber, 1828, on $26, 410, the appraised value of the personal estate
taken in execution at seven and a half per cent, on $26 67, and
three per cent, on the residue. And on $432 87, the balance, as
real estate, at three-fourths per cent.; amounting to $796 75;
with $7 26 costs of his petition; and the sums awarded to Philip
G. Lechleitner, leaving an unappropriated balance of $20, 164 98.
But although the whole of P. G. Lechleitner's claim, as adjusted


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 652   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives