clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 541   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
RIDGELY v. IGLEHART. 541
19th of February, 1824, and costs. Upon which judgment execu-
tion was issued and levied upon the lands which had so descended;
and, at the sale by the sheriff, this defendant became the purchaser
of the whole for the sum of $288 55; and the sheriff executed a
deed to him accordingly, which has been duly recorded. Thai mo
part of the share of this plaintiff in the purchase money arising
from the sale of the lands as descended, has been paid by Reuben
Ridgely, or by any person claiming from or through him, to this
plaintiff; and that his part of that purchase money, with the inte-
rest thereon, remains wholly due and unsatisfied. That this plain-
tiff is advised, that he has an equitable lien on all the real estate
descended, to secure the payment of his proportionable part of the
purchase money, into whosesoever hands the same may have come.
Whereupon he prayed, that the defendant Michael Iglehart might
be decreed to pay to the plaintiff his proportion of the purchase
money by a fixed day, or that, in case of his failure to do so, the
land might be sold to pay what was due to this plaintiff, and for
such other relief, &c.
Whereupon a subpoena having been issued and returned served,
the defendant appeared and put in the following demurrer.
The demurrer of Michael Iglehart of Anne Arundel county to
the bill of complaint of Robert Ridgely against him in Chancery
exhibited, This defendant by protestation not confessing or ac-
knowledging all or any of the matters or things in the complain-
ant's said bill of complaint to be true in manner and form as they
are therein alleged, for answer thereto this defendant doth demur
in law. And for cause of demurrer says, that the said bill contains
not any matter of equity whereon this court can ground any decree,
or give the complainant any relief, or assistance as against this
defendant. That if the matters stated in said bill do give the
complainant any cause of complaint or action against this defen-
dant the same is triable and determinable at law, and not to be
enquired into by this court. That the state of Maryland is, by the
complainant's own shewing, a proper and necessary party to any
suit or action in this court which may be prosecuted touching the
matters alleged in said bill. And that the heirs at law of William
Ridgely in said bill named, are likewise proper and necessary par-
ties thereto. Wherefore, and also for divers other errors and im-
perfections in said bill, this defendant doth demur thereto and
prays the judgment of this court whether he ought to make further
answer; and also prays to be hence dismissed with his costs, &c.


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 541   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives