clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 508   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
508 POST v. MACKALL,
as well under the peculiar circumstances, in the life-time as after the
death of the debtor, (o) A mere bounty of the testator enables the
But, in respect to the claim of the plaintiff McCormick, founded as regards the
whole real estate of the deceased debtor, on a promissory note for $2, 500; and, as
such, being an apparently indivisible cause of suit, it has been finally determined,
that the pleas of limitations which had been successfully directed against it, by the
defendants James Tilton and Clara Tilton, enured only to their own benefit, and
operated no farther than as a protection of their interests, by shewing that the plain-
tiff's claim had been satisfied as to them. Hence it now becomes necessary to as-
certain to what that proportional satisfaction amounts. These protective pleas ope-
rate as a bar of so much of the plaintiff's claim existing at the time of the death of
the deceased; and which, after deducting from it any payment obtained, or to which
it was entitled from the personal estate, might otherwise have been charged upon
the realty in the hands of these two defendants. —Haslewood v. Pope, 3 P. Will. 325.
And, therefore, their protective pleas operate as a bar of all costs, &c., incurred in
this suit; and as presumptive evidence of the payment, in some way, of such a pro-
portion of the whole debt so chargeable upon the whole of the deceased's real estate,
exclusive of the mortgaged estate, actually applied to the satisfaction of the mort-
gage debt, as the value of their interest therein bears to the value of the whole real
estate of the deceased at the time of his death, when their interests vested; and to
which time their protective pleas relate. —Long v. Short, 1 P. Will. 403, note; Craig
v. Baker, 2 Bland, 238, note. —James Tilton's life interest to have a value set upon
it as of that date by the Chancellor, as usual, on proof of his then age, health, &c.
This proportional deduction, unlike a claim for contribution, is an immediate and
preliminary right according to which the claim of the creditor must be cut down be-
fore any others, who may be liable, can be called upon to pay the sum thus ascer-
tained to be due.
In regard to all creditors, other than those herein before spoken of, it must also be
recollected, that the statute of limitations, in general, enures only to the benefit of him
who pleads it; that no creditor, who has a prior right of satisfaction, or has failed to
sustain his claim, or whose claim has been, in any way, wholly barred; and who,
consequently, has no interest to benefit or protect by a plea of limitations, can have
any standing in this court to direct such a plea against, or to the prejudice of any one
else. —Lingan v. Henderson, 1 Bland, 276. —That as the personal estate is primarily
liable, a well sustained plea of the statute of limitations, by an executor or admi-
nistrator, against the claim of any creditor must necessarily enure to the benefit of
the heirs; and, so too, a complete bar of any kind as against the personalty must, to
the same extent, be allowed to operate as a bar for the protection of the realty. —
Tessier v. Wyse, ante 28; S. 0. 4 G. and J. 296. —But although the executor or ad-
ministrator may not have pleaded the statute of limitations; or may have failed to
establish such a plea when relied on, nevertheless such a plea may be made available
by the heirs to cover the realty, a judgment even, against an executor or adminis-
trator, being no authentication whatever against the heirs. —Duvall v. Green, 4 H.
& J. 270; Putnam v. Bates, 3 Cond. Cha. Rep. 355; Dorsey v. Hammond, 1 Bland,
470, —That at a plea of the statute of limitations by one of several heirs enures
to. his benefit only, such a sustained plea by an heir operates as a bar of only such
a proportion of the creditor's claim as the whole of it bears to that of such heir's in-
terest in the whole real estate; that of the several pleas of limitations, relied on by
(o) Lacam v. Mertins, 1 Ves. 312; Aguilar v. Aguilar, 5 Mad. 414.


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 508   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives