clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 339   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
AUSTIN v. COCHRAN. 339
for the sale of the property mentioned in the proceedings therein,
with a stay of execution on said decree until the first day of June,
1827. for the payment of the claims legally due by the said William
Cochran and John G. Comegys, the said creditors, by their solicitors
agreeing to release the said William S. Cochran of and from all
claims for rents received by him or his guardian, from the house
and lot in Market street, in the city of Baltimore, in the proceed-
ings mentioned, where the said William Cochran formerly resided,
up to the said first day of June, 1827.' In conformity with this
agreement, a decree was passed, on the same day, directing the
real estate of the late William Cochran to be sold; and it was sold
accordingly, and the sale finally ratified on the 1st of February,
1828.
After which the proceedings were removed under the act of
1824, ch. 196, and filed here on the 29th of December, 1830.
And during the consideration of the case it was verbally intimated,
that the defendant William S. Cochran was in fact then dead.
5th May, 1831.—BLAND, Chancellor.—A creditor's suit is regu-
lated by principles, in relation to abatement, in some respects,
different from other suits. It is a general rule, that in all cases
where a plaintiff or a defendant dies whose entire interest is inse-
parably mingled with that of the other parties, and yet does not
devolve upon any of them, the suit abates; and no further pro-
ceedings can be had until it has been regularly revived, (a) But,
in a creditor's suit, all the other creditors of the same debtor may
come in and associate themselves, as plaintiffs, with the one by
whom it was instituted; and from the time such creditors file the
vouchers of their claims, or are otherwise admitted as co-plaintiffs,
the suit may be prosecuted by all or any of them as well as by the
originally suing plaintiff. They are all entitled to the same privi-
leges as plaintiffs; and each one is allowed to take the same stand
as against the defendant. And consequently, if he by whom the
suit was commenced, or any one who has afterwards come in, and
taken the position of a plaintiff, dies, the suit does not abate, if
there be, at the time, any other unsatisfied creditor standing as a
plaintiff; because, although the interest of the deceased does not
survive to any of the other parties; yet there are other plaintiffs to
whom all the rights, privileges and benefits of the suit do survive,
and who are competent to call upon the court for its decree; and
(a) Boddy v. Kent, 1 Meriv. 361.


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 3, Page 339   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives