clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 82   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

82. TOWNSHEND v. DUNCAN.

been able to ascertain the origin of the practice; but it seems to
have prevailed from an early period of the provincial government;

and the damage the said Kenelmn Cheseldine sustained thereby, is of the value of
61,500 lbs. of tobacco; and that the rest of the said tract of land, was held by
Col. Henry P. Jowles, deceased, from the said spring of 1718 to the time of Ms
death; and by his widow after his death, until her intermarriage with a certain
John Jowles, gentleman, deceased; and after his death, by her again until the said
October, 1739; and that the rents, issues, and profits of the same; and the damage
the same Cheseldine sustained thereby, is of the value of 1150 lbs. of tobacco per
annum, amounting in the whole, to 23,000 lbs. of tobacco. And the island and tract
of land called White's Neck, also mentioned in the same bill, were severally held
and occupied for the same space of time by Thomas T. Greenfield, gentleman,
deceased; and after his death by Ann Greenfield, his widow, or by his or her under-
tenants; and that the rents, issues and profits of the same, and the damage the
said Kenelmn Cheseldine sustained thereby was, and is of the value of 31,000 lbs.
of tobacco. All which is certified by us, the subscribers, this 28th day of
January, 1747. George Plater, Abraham Barnes, James Mills.'

May, 1748.—OGLE, Chancellor.—Decreed, that the said George Gordon, executor
of the said George Forbes, one of the defendants, pay to the complainant 61,500 lbs.
of tobacco out of the goods and chattels, which were of the said George Forbes, in
his hands to be administered; and that the complainant recover the same accord-
ingly. And that Dryden Forbes, one other of the defendants, pay unto the com-
plainant such part of the quantity of 23,000 lbs. of tobacco, as was received by the
said Henry P. Jowles, her former husband, in his life time, out of the goods and
chattels which were of the said Henry P. Jowles, remaining in her hands to be
administered, if so much she hath; and such part thereof as was received by the said
John Forbes, her second husband, out of the goods and chattels which were of the
said John Forbes, in her hands to be administered, if so much she hath; and the
residue of the said 23,000 lbs. of tobacco, which she received after the death of the
said Henry P. Jowles, and before her intermarriage with the said John Forbes; and
so much thereof as she received since the death of the said John Forbes, out of her
own proper goods and chattels, and that the complainant recover the same accord-
ingly. And that the other defendant Ann Greenfield, pay unto the complainant
go much of the 31,000 lbs. of tobacco, mentioned in the said return, as was received
by the said Thomas T. Greenfield, her testator, out of his goods and chattels remain-
ing in her hands to be administered, if so much she hath; and the residue of the
said 31,000 lbs. of tobacco, which she received since the death of her said testator,
out of her own proper goods and chattels, and that the complainant recover the same
accordingly. And it is further Decreed, that the complainant recover all his costs in
this cause against the defendants out of the goods and chattels of their respective
testators in their hands to be administered, if so much they have; if not, that the
complainant recover one-third part of the said costs of the proper goods and chattels
of the said Dryden Forbes, and one-third part thereof of the proper goods and chat-
tels of the said Ann Greenfield.'— Chancery Proceedings, lib. J. R. No. 5. fol.
339 to 371.

BARNEY v. HOLLINS.—4th January, 1810.—KILTY, Chancellor.—Decreed, that
the parties account with each other concerning the partnership transactions of the
Said parties, under the firm of Barney and Hollins in the proceedings mentioned.
That the auditor of this court state the account relative thereto, on the evidence in
the cause, and such other evidence as the parties may produce to him, on notice as

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 82   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives