clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 72   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

72 TOWNSHEND v. DUNCAN.

give special directions to the master, to the commissioners, or
to the persons to whom the case was sent, (e) All reports of a

land, in white servants; and the sum of ,£32 1s, 7d. paper money of Maryland, in
cattle, horses, and sheep; and the sum of £ 13 6s. 6d, paper money of Maryland, in
plate, belonging to the complainants* late father, Amos Woodward; and the sum of
£2 15*. lid. in gold tea-spoons, belonging to the complainants' late father, as the
same were valued in his estate. And it is Ordered, that the white servants, cattle,
horses, and sheep, be valued by Thomas Worthington and John Bullen, of Anne
Arundel county, gentlemen; and that they value the same, as near as can be, of like
value with the white servants, horses, cattle and sheep that were appraised in the
estate of the complainants' father, Amos Woodward.

And it is further Decreed, that the said William Chapman pay unto the complain-
ants, out of the estate of Achsa Fottrell and Edward Fottrell, which have come to
his hands, interest at the rate of six pounds per cent, per annum on the sum of 431/2
pounds of tobacco, [1704, ch. 69, s. 1;] £51 15s. 3d 1/2. current money, in gold or
silver; £216 7s. 0 1/4d. sterling; and £377 19s. l0d. paper money of Maryland;
which is due to each child, exclusive of white servants, cattle, horses, sheep, plate,
and gold tea-spoons. It being thought reasonable, by this court, that no interest
should be paid for so much of the estate as consisted in white servants, cattle,
horses, sheep, plate, and gold tea-spoons, which are to be returned in specie to each
of the complainants, [1715, ch. 39, s. 11, 12,16, and 17,] from the 15th day of Feb-
ruary, in the year of our Lord 1741, till the same be paid to the complainants.
And, that so much as is decreed to be paid to the complainants Mary and Elizabeth,
who are arrived at the age of sixteen years, to be paid into their own hands, [1715,
ch, 89, s. 15;] and that so much as is decreed to be paid to the complainant Henry,
be paid to Edward Dorsey, his guardian; and that so much as is decreed to be paid
to the complainant Eleanor, be paid to John Ridgely, her guardian; and that the
said Edward Dorsey and John Ridgely respectively give security, at the next court
to be held for Anne Arundel county, to be approved of by the justices of the said
court, to pay such sums as they have, or shall receive of the said Chapman, to the
said Henry Woodward when he shall arrive at the age of twenty-one years; and to
the said Eleanor Woodward when she shall arrive at the age of sixteen years; and
that the complainants, or their guardians, give unto the said William Chapman good
security to return a rateable part of what they shall receive to satisfy any debt or
debts which shall hereafter appear to be due from the said Amos Woodward, with
the payment whereof the law will charge the said William Chapman as administra-
tor; and that the complainants pay two-thirds of the costs of this suit; and the said
William Chapman one-third part thereof. And it is further Ordered, that the said
William Chapman use his utmost endeavours to receive what debts are due to the
estate of the said Amos Woodward at this time; and that he render an account of
what he shall receive, upon oath, to this court, by the last day of November next.—
Chancery Proceedings, lib. J. R. No. 5, fol 157 to 212.

(t) SLOSS v. McILVANE.—This was a bill for an account, filed on the 16th of
May, 1760, by Thomas Sloss against William and David McIlvane; in which the
dealings and transactions between the parties were set out at great length. The bill
concludes by alleging, that the defendants are residents of Philadelphia, but are
expected soon to be in the province—upon which it prays a ne exeat, to the sheriff
of Kent, and also a duplicate of the writ to the sheriff of Cecil.

To this bill, an affidavit was subjoined in the following words: 'The said Thomas
Sloss, the complainant in the annexed bill of complaint, makes oath, that the said
William and David McIlvane, the defendants in the said bill named, are justly

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 72   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives