clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 702   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

702 . INDEX.

of a certain amount due, duplicate

It is sufficient that the husband alone be

writs of ne exeat are ordered to seve
ral counties, in one or other of which

made a party, to shew that he has ob-
tained satisfaction of the chose in action

the defendants were expected to be

of his wife. — Contee v. Dawson, 281.

found Sloss v. McIlvane, 72.

Who may or must be made parties to a

 

creditor's suit. — Hammond v, Ham-

OPINION.

ond, 347, 349.

opinion asked by a Provincial Chan-

The creditors of the ancestor of a deceased

cellor of some of the judges

debtor may come in under a creditor's

courts of Westminster.— Birchfield v.

suit, without making the executor or

Miller, 59.

administrator of such deceased ancestor

The Chancellor may ask the opinion of

parties. — Hindman v. Clayton, 341.

the judges on any question of law. —
Chamberlain v. Brown, 221.

Where the debt is joint and several, all
the debtors must be made parties. —

 

Watkins v. Worthington, 522.

PARTITION.

The general rule, that all persons inte-

A partition of personal estate can be or-

rested must be made parties, is made

dered only by a Court of Chancery ;

to yield where necessary either as io

and if necessary, a sale may be order-

plaintiffs or defendants, 524

ed.— Crapster v. Griffith, 25.

All questions as to parties must be finally

On a partition decreed to be made among

adjusted before there can be a decree to

devisees, the parties ordered to pay
costs in proportion. — Winder v. Diffen-
derffer, 179, 180.

account. — Helms v. Franciscus, 559.
Alt persons having an interest in the ob-
ject of the suit should be made parties.

A part of the property being incapable of
partition, ordered to be sold, and the

Worthington v. Lee, 680.
A mortgagor who has not been legally

proceeds divided among the devisees,

divested of his whole interest, must be

130.

made a party, 682.

A trustee who had held the estate order-

A mortgagor who has an interest in sta-

ed to account for its rents and profits,

ting the account, or fiom whom any

179.

discovery may be drawn, may be made

Real estate devised to be sold and the

a party, 683.

proceeds divided, on petition ex parte,

It is not necessary to make the personal

a trustee appointed for that purpose. —
Ex parte Boone, 321.

representatives of the mortgagor a party
to a bill to foreclose or sell; but upon

Bonds taken by the trustee who made

the death of the mortgagee it is neces-

the sale, ordered to be assigned to the
parties entitled, 321.

sary to make both his heirs and per-
sonal representatives parties, 684.

A devise of the rents and profits of land

PATENT.

for the maintenance of several infants,
not susceptible of partition. — Tilly v.

A patent vacated on the ground of fraud.
Seward v. Hicks, 261.

Tilly, 438.
Specific performance of an agreement for
partition decreed. — Norwood v. Nor-
wood, 476, 483, 485.

A patent cancelled by tearing off the seal
in open court, and sending a certificate
thereof to the other courts where it had
been recorded, 262.

PARTIES.

Where the relator, or he under whom he

No one is a party to the suit against
whom no process is prayed. — Binney's
case, 106.

claims had notice, and yet made no
opposition, the patent will not be va-
cated. — The Attorney General v. Biggs,

A misnomer may be waived, but if relied
on it is fatal, 107.

262.
PLEA.

Where the legal capacities of parties as

An answer as to the same facts over-rules

charged are different, such capacities

the plea.— The Bank v. Dugan, 257.

must be considered as if they were

PORT

different persons, 108.— Tilly v. Tilly,
445.

What constitutes a port, its nature, &c. —

A corporation can only be called on to
answer by its proper name. — Binney's
case, 106.

Binney's case, 156, 157.
Canal and sea vessels should meet in a
port, 162, 165.

A ereditor's suit making the heir at com-
mon law a party, with a publication

PRACTICE.

Where one of the defendants answers and

against the other heirs.- Kilty v.

disclaims, the bill may be at once dis-

Brown, 223.

missed as to him with costs. — Kipp v.

To a creditor's suit by a surety his prin-

Hanna, 28.

cipal was not made a party. — Arthur v.
The Attorney General, 246.

A feme covert on failing to answer may be
attached, 28.



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 702   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives