clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 484   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

484 MURDOCK'S CASE.

say they did not act as the agents, or with the consent or know-,
ledge of Gilbert Murdock; that they together drove some sheep to

such ferry, or in carrying on a ferry at the said place, in case the said Edward shall
think proper to provide for carrying on the same, on the said Samuel's refusing or
neglecting to carry the same on jointly with the said Edward, or singly, allowing
the said Edward one-half of the profits; and that the said Samuel be further en-
joined not to change, or stop up, or obstruct the passage of any road, on either side
of the river leading to the said ferry, without the consent of the said Edward; but
that all access, as heretofore, shall be allowed by the said Samuel, ta every person,
carriage, horse or other animal, or thing coming to the said ferry, or which would
come to it, in ease there was no obstruction. And in case the said Samuel shall
refuse, neglect, or delay to carry on a ferry jointly with the said Edward, at the
place where the ferry aforesaid, first mentioned in the bill, was carried on, and the
said Edward shall think proper to carry on the same for their joint benefit, he, the
said Samuel, is hereby enjoined not to carry on without the said Edward's consent,
any ferry which shall interfere with, or take custom from the ferry carried on at the
said place. And in case the said Edward, on the said Samuel's refusal, neglecting
or delaying as aforesaid, shall actually set up and carry on a ferry at the place afore-
said, he shall pay weekly to the said Samuel, one-half of the profits thereof, after
deducting the expense incurred in so setting up and carrying on. And it is further
Decreed, that the defendant pay unto the complaisant, the costs by him expended,
in the prosecution of his suit, amounting as taxed by the register, to the quantity of
18,220 pounds of tobacco.

On the fullest consideration of all the circumstances of this case, and of the prin-
ciples established in this court, the Chancellor has, at length, passed a decree,
which, independent of the consent of the parties, and of another tribunal, must be
final. After much anxious thought he has satisfied his own judgment and con-
science. His feelings will be much gratified if the parties shall be satisfied, that he
has done neither more nor less than his duty required; but it appeared to him pos-
sible, without their consent, to place them precisely in the situation contemplated
by their agreement. It has hitherto been his practice to consult, as far as possible,
consistently with justice, the welfare of every person who has come before him;
and therefore he has not unfrequently proposed to settle a controversy, and to save
much further vexation and expense by a decree or consent. Whatever may be the
prospect of success, he cannot forbear suggesting to the present parties an accom-
modation on such terms, as he conceives an enlightened arbitrator who should be
equally a friend to justice, and to each of them, would prescribe. It is evident, that
without a good understanding between them, the ferry cannot advantageously be
carried on; and it must remain a constant subject of contention, supposing even
that the foregoing decree is to stand. But in their causes there is a variety of diffi-
cult points; what will be the decision of the Court of Appeals is uncertain; and if,
in the course of their lives, an end can be put to their controversies, neither can
possibly so far succeed as to have been a gainer by it. He is certain then, that
neither can be a loser by acceding to his proposal. Actuated by the principles of
humanity, and partial to neither, he flatters himself, that neither can reasonably be
offended by a proposition, which, he conceives, will appear reasonable to the friends
of both, and to every unprejudiced, disinterested person. On the evidence in the
cause, together with the information he has otherwise received, he proposes, that
they sign and file in this court an agreement, to the following effect.

Pint, that the foregoing decree be set aside by another decree; second, that;
the new decree direct Samuel Norwood, on the first day of November next, to pay

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 484   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives